1, and the calculation standard of level 2 and level 10 disability in traffic accidents is:

(1) If the road traffic accident causes two tenth-level disabilities, it is generally more appropriate to compensate with 12%;

(2) There are two levels of disability, only the highest level of disability compensation index is calculated, and other levels of disability are calculated according to the additional index instead of the corresponding disability compensation index.

2. Legal basis: Article 35 of the Regulations on Industrial Injury Insurance.

Workers with work-related injuries are identified as seven to ten disabled, and enjoy the following benefits:

(1) The industrial injury insurance fund will pay a one-time disability subsidy according to the disability level. The criteria are: level 7 disability 12 months, level 8 disability 10 months, level 9 disability for 8 months and level 10 disability for 6 months;

(two) the expiration of the labor contract, or the employee himself proposed to terminate the labor contract, the employer shall pay a one-time work-related injury medical subsidy and disability employment subsidy. Specific standards shall be formulated by the people's governments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government.

2. Disagree with the conclusion of traffic accident disability appraisal?

If the parties to a traffic accident are dissatisfied with the appraisal conclusion, the remedies they can choose include applying for re-appraisal and excluding it through cross-examination, or reducing the probative force of the disability appraisal conclusion.

The reassessment is as follows:

1. For the disability appraisal conclusion entrusted by the parties themselves, the other party may not recognize it and apply for re-appraisal;

2. The appraisal conclusion agreed by both parties or the appraisal conclusion of the appraisal institution designated by the court.

(1) The appraisal institution or appraiser does not have the corresponding appraisal qualification;

(2) The appraisal procedure is seriously illegal;

(3) The appraisal conclusion is obviously insufficient;

(4) After cross-examination, it is determined that the appraisal conclusion cannot be used as evidence, and by analogy, one party may apply for re-appraisal.

If the conclusion of defect appraisal can be solved by supplementary appraisal, re-examination or incomplete cross-examination, it will not be re-appraised.

If there are objections to the appraisal conclusion, but due to limited professional knowledge, it is impossible to find appropriate reasons, you can ask the appraiser who made the appraisal conclusion to appear in court for cross-examination, or you can entrust a new expert with specialized knowledge to appear in court for cross-examination of the appraiser. Fully cross-examine the evaluation conclusion through the above methods.