What is the minimum subscription amount of a public offering fund? Can Public Offering of Fund invest in the New Third Board?
Public offering fund c share:
The biggest difference between the class C share and the original class A share is mainly in the rate and sales channels. First of all, as far as subscription fees are concerned, most C-share subscription fees are zero, and only a few C-share funds charge subscription fees in stages. For large purchases of more than 5 million yuan, only a fixed subscription fee of 1 000 yuan will be charged, and for purchases of less than 5 million yuan, the subscription fee will be gradually increased according to the different subscription amounts.
Secondly, as far as the redemption fee is concerned, the charging standard adopted by most Class C shares is 0.5% for holding within 30 days and 0 for holding for more than 30 days. Some monetary and bond funds also give 0 redemption fee directly.
Third, sales service fees are generally levied on class C shares, while traditional class A shares are not. Judging from the share of Class C established this year, the sales service fee is generally between 0. 1%-0.8%.
Fourth, as far as sales channels are concerned, most of the C shares are limited to the direct sales platform of fund companies and do not cover traditional channels or third-party sales platforms.
Asset management ability is favored by institutional funds.
Industry analysts pointed out that the establishment of Class C shares is mostly to attract institutional funds. In the context of asset shortage, more and more institutional funds intend to allocate assets through fund public offering. Compared with banks and insurance companies, fund companies have relatively weak fund-raising ability, but strong asset management ability, so institutional funds are more likely to hit it off with Public Offering of Fund.
A person from the marketing department of a large fund company in South China told me that institutional funds have certain timing and asset allocation capabilities, and some institutional funds tend to do some band operations when investing in Public Offering of Fund, so relatively low transaction costs are the key to attracting such funds. "Now that the market is in a downturn, it is expected that the annualized expected income will decline. For institutional funds, the rate of several percentage points has become a' battleground for military strategists'. "
"Many companies and investment institutions hold a lot of highly liquid assets, such as cash. Such assets are highly liquid, but the expected annualized expected return is often the worst. In theory, the funds of enterprises and institutions can be managed as long as they are idle for one day or more. On the basis of ensuring liquidity, reducing costs has an obvious effect on improving the expected annualized expected income of financial management. " A financial analyst of a third-party research institution pointed out.
From another perspective, Mars, an analyst at Shanghai Securities Fund Evaluation and Research Center, pointed out that increasing the share of Class C may also be related to the market development layout of subsequent FOF products. Fund companies take the initiative to add Class C shares to their index fund products with obvious annualized expected return characteristics, which is conducive to reducing the transaction costs of investors' short-term allocation, and is also conducive to fund companies attracting FOF funds and bringing their products into the fund portfolio. Nowadays, the share of Class C has gradually expanded from early bonds and innovation funds to index and stock products, which provides a more convenient choice for institutional funds to implement industry rotation, flexible asset allocation and manage small cash flow.
At the same time, she pointed out that Class C shares are mainly aimed at funds that implement biased trading strategies. For ordinary individual investors, the cost and risk of active position adjustment and target conversion are very high. If long-term investment is the mainstay, it is more appropriate to comprehensively choose Class A stocks with more favorable long-term holding costs.