Public welfare undertakings refer to departments, enterprises and their facilities that directly or indirectly serve economic activities, social activities and residents' lives.

So what is the business scope of public welfare undertakings?

Next, please enjoy the business scope of public welfare undertakings that I have collected and compiled for you from the Internet.

Business scope of public welfare undertakings: 1. Public welfare first-class institutions.

Refers to public institutions that involve national security, public safety, public health, public culture, economic and social order, and the basic rights of citizens, and that the government must protect and cannot or are not suitable for allocating resources by the market, as well as those that only serve

A public institution that provides support and guarantee for the government to perform its functions.

The purpose and business scope of such units are determined by the government and strictly supervised, and they are not allowed to engage in business activities.

2. Category II public welfare institutions.

It refers to public institutions that provide public welfare services to the whole society that relate to the general needs of the people and the needs of economic and social development, are supported by the government, and can partially realize the allocation of resources by the market, as well as public institutions that mainly provide support and guarantee for the government to perform its functions.

Such units carry out activities in accordance with the public welfare goals and relevant standards determined by the state. On the premise of ensuring the realization of public welfare goals, they can carry out relevant business activities in accordance with the law. The operating income obtained in accordance with the law is mainly used for the development of public welfare undertakings.

3. Public welfare institutions of the third category.

Refers to public institutions whose business activities have certain public welfare attributes, but have a high degree of socialization, strong ability to integrate with the market, and can basically allocate resources by the market.

If such units independently carry out public welfare services and related business activities, and are entrusted by the government to undertake relevant public welfare tasks, the government will provide corresponding support by purchasing services.

Those who meet the conditions for enterprise transformation will gradually be converted into enterprises.

The operating characteristics of public welfare undertakings ①Externality.

Departments and enterprises belonging to public welfare undertakings and their activities generally exist outside the direct production process, individual business activities and residents' daily lives. They exist independently, operate in parallel, and constitute a relatively independent system.

②Sociality.

Most public welfare undertakings mainly rely on social investment and construction, and the funds rely on national finance. The investment mainly reflects social benefits and environmental benefits.

③Enjoy sex.

Public welfare services are enjoyed by many units and residents.

④Intangibility.

Most of the products provided by public welfare undertakings are intangible services rather than tangible material products.

⑤Welfare.

The products provided by public welfare undertakings have a large component of social services and social welfare.

Reference significance for the management of public welfare undertakings 1. Non-governmental organizations can be divided into two types from a policy perspective: private public welfare organizations and non-profit enterprises.

The significance of this division is to adopt different tax preferential policies, government support policies and different supervision and management methods accordingly.

For non-governmental public welfare organizations, since they carry out public welfare and charity activities for the whole society, they must adopt a comprehensive tax-free preferential policy and provide financial support through government entrustment or government procurement. At the same time, they must be encouraged to carry out various forms of social fundraising activities to obtain from

Charity donations from all aspects of society and encourage volunteers to actively participate in the charity activities of these organizations.

Since such organizations operate public welfare properties, they should be restricted from carrying out business activities, enforce the principles of openness and transparency in accordance with the law, and implement strict social supervision.

For non-profit enterprises (including commercial service entities such as schools and hospitals and market intermediary organizations such as industry associations), because the public services they provide are either market transactional or mutually beneficial, they should be encouraged by policy

To participate in market competition and rely on the market to maintain the development of the organization, the government can take certain tax reduction measures to provide preferential treatment.

2. The partnership between the government and private public welfare organizations should be clarified through an agreement.

Due to their extremely wide range of activities and varying scales, non-governmental public welfare organizations have relationships with governments at all levels and government departments in their activities. Since they are both in the public sector, there is disharmony, friction and even contradiction between them.

It is inevitable that COMPACT plays an important role as a code of conduct and programmatic document for all levels of British government and government departments in dealing with the relationship with private public welfare organizations. We can learn from the British experience to explore the establishment of a good relationship between the government and private public welfare organizations.

Some basic guidelines and fixing these guidelines in an agreement or other binding form.

3. The government should institutionalize it as an obligation to vigorously fund private public welfare activities.

Through its annual public welfare expenditure of 3.3 billion pounds for private public welfare organizations, the British government has actually obtained public welfare services provided by these organizations to the society three times that of the government expenditure, which shows that mobilizing private public welfare has great social benefits.

China's private public welfare organizations generally face financial difficulties, and the actual funds provided by the government are extremely limited and irregular.

It is recommended that on the one hand, we draw on the British experience and use social welfare lottery revenue as a financial source for government public welfare expenditures; on the other hand, we use certain fiscal funds to provide support to private welfare organizations in the form of open competition through institutionalized government procurement.

4. A national supervisory agency independent of the government administrative system should be established.