1 is reasonable, but it is also debatable, that is, many theme funds are defined too broadly or don't invest according to the theme at all, so it is quite reasonable to exclude situations that are not worthy of the name. However, there are few funds that can reasonably grasp the rotation of the plate, which does not necessarily mean that high-quality funds have advantages.

The pharmaceutical industry still has good prospects in the future. Aging and increased medical insurance investment are very obvious driving factors.

These themes are too new, and the first two are new. The fund operation time of related topics is too short, which has no reference value and is environmentally friendly. It is suggested that rich countries should be low-carbon and environmentally friendly, and spend more money. It is suggested that the Agricultural Bank of China use foreign exchange for consumption, and use foreign exchange to enrich consumption.

If you don't understand, sincerely welcome questions; If I am lucky enough to help you, please adopt in time! thank you