Small problems, nature is the property company responsible for maintenance. The property fee has included the elevator minor repair fee. (If the elevator fee is charged separately, it should also be included in the elevator fee. )

Repair, overhaul and replace key components (such as circuit boards and elevator cables). ) can be paid from the property special maintenance funds (commonly known as overhaul funds and property maintenance funds).

If there is no special maintenance fund for the old house, or the special maintenance fund is insufficient to pay all the elevator maintenance expenses, the difference shall be borne by all the beneficial owners of the elevator.

"Generally speaking, the property company does not need to bear the expenses for the overhaul or replacement of the elevators in the community, and they can't afford it. The failure of the elevator itself is the responsibility of the owner. After all, the property management company is only hired by the owners. If some owners do not pay attention to themselves and do not take responsibility, the property company does not need to take responsibility. " Lin Shuquan, a lawyer of Guangdong Shilin Law Firm, believes that elevators belong to public facilities and all owners. The owner of the lower floor can't refuse to take the responsibility of not using the elevator. "This has no legal basis."

For the problems faced by the community, Lin Shuquan suggested that either the industry Committee should come forward to find a way, or the affected high-rise residents should pay for maintenance first and then recover from other residents afterwards. "As for the low-rise residents who think that the elevator quality is unqualified or the maintenance quotation is unreasonable, the owner can solve it through tripartite quotation or bidding, and even the industry Committee can find its own organization to carry out maintenance. This is another problem. "