Inferior gifts, which are seriously inconsistent with the quotation; Donors don't seem to need much help; Donation process, vague cloud and mountain fog cover; As a result of the donation, there is not even a paper receipt. This series of illogical behaviors makes people think: is this management confusion or is someone fishing in troubled waters? Ironically, the management principles of Renai Fund are: timely assistance, openness and transparency, respect for the wishes of donors, and reflection of funding benefits. However, all the donations did not meet the requirements of the Red Cross. The Red Cross has a century-old foundation and can't stand any trouble.

Huashang daily

Some critics say that a charity recognized by the society is a qualified charity. The Red Cross has been plunged into a credit crisis. On the surface, our charity's finance is opaque and its management is not standardized, but the deep-seated problem is that the whole charity system is flawed. A netizen on Huasheng Online: Seeing this, I think it is a matter of interest. Charity fund is a charity, and the source of funds is a problem. The department that provides the funds will not ignore the return. Bicycles coming back from various channels have become a means of return. On the one hand, it won the good reputation of Renai Fund, on the other hand, it can also make a publicity for these companies that spend money. In addition, I donated money to the Bureau of Retired Veteran Cadres because I took a fancy to the contacts and relationships of those retired cadres in the Bureau of Retired Veteran Cadres. This move by Renai Fund is conducive to circuitous solution to the problems existing in the reality of Renai Fund.

A commentary of Shihua Financial News said: After Guo Meimei's incident, the public had too much distrust of China's charity, which was once fatal. However, the Red Cross has repeatedly reduced its credibility. I really don't want you to be a loser.

China management network

China Red Cross "Charity Fund" has been widely questioned by the public because of its initiative to donate inferior bicycles to non-vulnerable groups such as large state-owned enterprises.

Cheng, a legal worker in Weinan City, thinks that the Mining Bureau is the largest and best enterprise in Heyang County. It is said that it cost more than 3.6 million yuan to organize a singing contest last year, and it is unbelievable that Renai Fund helped such "vulnerable groups".

For such a sponsor, a media worker in Weinan City who has been paying attention to this matter believes that "this kind of funding is more like a kind of welfare, and it simply does not reflect the funding effect."

Red cross response

On the evening of 27th, Zhao, the executive vice president of China Red Cross Society, accepted an exclusive interview with a reporter from the first response column of Xinhuanet. Zhao said that at present, the China Red Cross Foundation and relevant institutions are conducting a comprehensive and in-depth investigation on this matter. China Red Cross Society will not tolerate any organizations and individuals that violate laws and regulations, and will definitely deal with them severely according to law. On April 26th, 20 12, China Red Cross Foundation responded by its official Weibo: China Red Cross Foundation has paid attention to the media reports about the donation of bicycles by Renai Fund, which is highly concerned. It has launched an investigation into the relevant circumstances of the response. If the report is true, I will seriously investigate and deal with it, and will inform the investigation results.

On April 26, a reporter interviewed the relevant person in charge of the career development center of the Chinese Red Cross Society and Shi Jinlong respectively. Wu Angping, executive deputy director of the Career Development Center, said that Shi Jinlong was the director of the volunteer office they hired, but it has expired.