I think it’s feasible: From a national perspective, it doesn’t matter if the money is kept for a certain period of time. It’s all deposited in the bank anyway. The bank can lend and earn back the interest. For the maintenance fund management department, it is of great significance.

First, there are sufficient funds for special use, secondly, there is no need for state appropriation, and thirdly, there is no need to levy separate taxes from owners. For owners who pay maintenance funds, I have not found any advantage at present. At most, they will not levy separate taxes.

Even if it cannot be returned to the owner, it is still good to use it for other aspects of the community.

Some time ago, wasn't there a lot of talk about social security funds entering the market?

Since some people have proposed that social security funds can be used and there are risks, why can't the maintenance funds be deposited on a regular basis? There is no risk at all?

That's totally fine.