The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University in Henan Province issued two reports on the investigation and handling of academic misconduct. The first notification was a letter or document forwarded by Zhengzhou University to the National Natural Science Foundation of China, accusing many doctors in the hospital of academic misconduct and falsification of papers. The second report was forwarded by Zhengzhou University to the Office of Henan Provincial Education Department. More than 400 papers? The Notice and Publicity of Appraisal Results of Suspected Fraud accused many doctors of academic misconduct such as forged papers and irregular signatures.

On the one hand, consumers who know and buy fakes simply don't get the real meaning of the seller's goods in the process of buying and selling. On the contrary, their morality is not noble enough, showing a tendency to seek profits that people spurn! This kind of fraud itself is related to civil legal acts? The meaning must be true? Shall not violate social morality. Conflict with legal requirements. On the other hand, in the consumer protection law? Consumers? It means that individuals buy, use goods or receive services for their daily needs, and the purchase behavior for the purpose of counterfeiting does not belong to consumption behavior, then? Know the fake and buy the fake? Behavior is not supported by this law. What will be the "Regulations of Shanghai Municipality on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests (Revised Draft)"? Know the fake and buy the fake? Completely excluded from the scope of legal protection.

Relevant provisions of the Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of Civil Law. ? Know the fake and buy the fake? If some consumers have no motive or purpose to seek personal gain, they should be found innocent and the price they paid to the operators should be returned. Of course, the fake and shoddy goods or shopping invoices it holds can be a powerful evidence for consumers to report and administrative law enforcement departments or judicial organs to investigate and deal with operators. It can be seen that there are two different legal relationships between consumers and operators, and between operators and administrative law enforcement departments or judicial organs, which should be solved separately. We can't ignore the protection of consumers' legitimate rights and interests and the legal significance of this behavior in counterfeiting just because the Consumer Protection Law is not suitable for determining the legality of this behavior.