Those who work hard contribute more to society than those who work hard. Opposition debate: Chairman Liu Ping, fellow debaters, first of all, I would like to elaborate on the meaning of hardworking people and hard workers.

Page 756 of the Modern Chinese Dictionary explains: A laborer refers to a person who is mainly engaged in mental work, and a laborer refers to a person who is mainly engaged in manual labor.

Of course, the opponent’s fellow debater explained this very well.

Indeed, the appreciation of social wealth and the overall development of society are jointly created by those who work hard and those who work hard, and both are indispensable.

Therefore, we do not deny the contribution of laborers, but we believe that those who work hard make greater contributions to society than those who work hard.

Below I will elaborate on our views from three aspects.

First, consciousness has a huge reaction, especially correct consciousness can better guide people's practice.

What is modern society?

Or what direction is modern society developing in?

That is the information society. The information society is a society in which the knowledge economy dominates. The production process will become increasingly automated, production labor will become increasingly intellectualized, and the contribution of mental labor to society will become increasingly prominent.

For example, Bill Gates, the world's richest man, is a typical hard worker in the information society. The Microsoft technology he created has been witnessed by people all over the world.

In 2001, he also established the world's largest charitable foundation, with a total amount of US$24 billion.

Second, we hardworking people have the most advanced production methods and can create more value for society. I believe everyone has heard this saying, "Chinese people rely on two levels of income to eat, one relies on Deng Xiaoping, and the other relies on Yuan Longping. His

Hybrid rice can increase rice production by 20%. By 2010, it will at least solve the problem of food and clothing for more than 1 billion people. Isn't this a big enough contribution? Third, we laborers have rich scientific and cultural knowledge and scientific theories, and we have

More agile innovation capabilities. "Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and the key to modern international competition is technological competition.

"This is not what I said, it was said by Deng Xiaoping. The "Action Program for National Scientific Literacy" promulgated by the State Council in 2005 clearly stated: Improving the scientific and cultural literacy of the entire population is an important foundation for building an innovative country. A country without innovation capabilities will

It is difficult to stand among the nations of the world.” Therefore, our point of view is that those who work hard can make greater contributions to society than those who work hard!

Thanks!

Opponent’s Second Debate: Zhu Sihua First of all, I would like to ask the opponent’s opponent to pay attention to a few issues: The opponent’s opponent said: “Production practice is the most basic practical activity of human beings. Production labor runs through the beginning of human society, creating the needed things for mankind.

Means of production and means of living. "But, does the basic one contribute more?

People must eat and wear clothes to live, but do people live just to eat and wear clothes?

It is obvious that those who work hard organize social resources, manage laborers, create huge material and spiritual wealth, and contribute more to the development of society.

The opponent's fellow debater also said: "The people are the main body of practice." Please note that the people here do not only refer to laborers, but also include those who work hard.

Although the proportion of hardworking people in this group is small, their contribution cannot be quantified. Just because the proportion of hardworking people is small does not mean that their contribution is small.

The other debater also said: "Labors are the main body of labor." However, those who work hard also have labor. Those who work hard use wisdom or higher knowledge to drive workers to realize value. Without the guidance of highly intelligent people, pure labor

What you get will be very small, even barren.

The changes and development of things are ultimately achieved through qualitative change. Without qualitative change, there would be no development.

If things only stay in the stage of quantitative change, it will only be the repetition or increase or decrease of the same thing. The fundamental nature of things will not change, and development will not be realized.

Only qualitative changes and leaps are changes in the fundamental nature of things, and new things can replace old things.

So how do you make the leap?

The key lies in those who work hard. People who work hard pay close attention to things. When the quantitative change has reached a certain level, those who work hard decisively and seize the opportunity to break through its scope and limits, accumulate small things to promote qualitative changes, and realize the leap and development of things.

Therefore, we believe that those who work hard can make greater contributions to society than those who work hard.

Four opposing debates: Wang Wei Hello everyone! First of all, I would like to thank the school for giving us this opportunity to debate.

The pages of history have opened up the corners of the present era. We have built populated towns on once barren lands. We have explored the treasures in the seemingly unfathomable oceans. We have left behind traces in the high sky.

footprints.

All of this is the result of the simultaneous action of those who work hard and those who work hard. As for the question of who has the greater contribution, the person who works hard or the hard work, from ancient times to the present, I think the answer should be more clear in today's era.

That is: those who work hard make greater contributions.

First of all, I would like to summarize the mistakes in the other debater’s views.

First, the opposing debater emphasizes that laborers are the main body engaged in production practice. However, the opposing debater please note that the problem cannot be viewed from a quantitative perspective.

Second, the opposing debater has repeatedly said that laborers play a basic role, but the basic ones are not necessarily the most important.

We have already explained this point.

The role of those who work hard is certainly great, but the role of those who work hard is even greater.