Some people say that the disaster of the epidemic is like a magic mirror. Only when the tide recedes can you see who was swimming naked. The same goes for people and the truth.

I deeply agree with this.

In the face of the fierce pneumonia epidemic, the Red Cross has frequently engaged in "sexy operations", which has exhausted the public's trust in charity.

And Han Hong, who would rather donate her savings to charity, was pushed to the forefront and attracted the attention of thousands of people.

As a result, everyone placed all their hopes on Han Hong. A large number of netizens even said that they only believed in Han Hong when it came to charity.

This would be embarrassing. A certain organization is a formal organization. How could a formal system tolerate this gap? So he had to do everything he could to save the situation.

Compared with a certain association, Han Hong is just a weak civil organization that can only shine weakly.

Although his abilities are limited, he is pushed to the forefront by netizens.

They know that if they want to bring down Han Hong, they can only achieve their goal by controlling public opinion and only by treating Han Hong as a target.

At this time, a millionaire V appeared and pointed out that "the Han Hong Charity Fund's public welfare expenditures in 2018 accounted for 45.87% of the balance of the previous year, which was lower than the 70% required by the country." As soon as this statement came out, there was a commotion

The city is full of storm.

Not only that, in addition to the big V, there are also other black fans who use this as a target to denounce Han Hong.

Their only purpose is to gain the upper hand in public opinion and bring down Han Hong.

Unexpectedly, they failed this time. Everyone supported Han Hong overwhelmingly and believed in Han Hong unconditionally. At this time, they realized that it would be difficult to defeat Han Hong.

But bringing down Han Hong is like a mission, and it can't end like this.

After a few days of this going on, yesterday, a blogger reported Han Hong online with his real name. He said that the Han Hong Charity Foundation had violated the law. He also wrote an article with detailed materials and submitted it to

It immediately attracted the attention of countless netizens.

The blogger wrote on Weibo that the Han Hong Charitable Foundation had a total of 300 million yuan that had never been disclosed to the public, and its whereabouts were unknown. Moreover, each cycle lasted for many years, and there were no specific details.

Publicizing it violated the law, so he requested the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau to investigate and deal with it in a timely manner and uploaded his personal information online.

In the face of the report, Han Hong did not respond.

After the blogger made a real-name report, the relevant departments quickly started an investigation.

If one wave fails, there will be another wave. Since it cannot be brought down once, then it will be repeated many times to slowly guide public opinion.

At this time, they will magnify Han Hong's shortcomings and ignore her advantages. They know that as long as they can defeat her this time, everyone's trust in Han Hong will be gone, and it will be difficult for Han Hong to think about her again.

A certain society never thought that a little Han Hong would pose a threat to them, so when Han Hong established the foundation, they ignored her at all. In their eyes, Han Hong was just a little shrimp, and a little shrimp wouldn't have much energy.

, but they were wrong.

Because of her justice, Han Hong won the support of netizens and developed rapidly.

To be honest, in the face of the blogger's real-name report, we can't say anything now. If it is true, then this blogger deserves admiration. After all, public welfare is no small matter.

If he is deliberately trying to guide public opinion, then such a person will not die a good death.

We don’t know whether this incident is true or not. We can only wait for the relevant departments to announce the investigation results.

In the face of a national crisis, under special circumstances, there may indeed be some procedural or management problems in the operation of the Han Hong Foundation, which need to be standardized.

We also know that trust cannot replace supervision, but this does not mean that this is Han Hong’s personal problem, which needs to be distinguished.

I believe that the Han Hong Foundation will improve relevant procedures as soon as possible and continue to standardize the operation and management of the foundation.