Huawei is not breaking the law by suing the US FCC.

The Federal Communications Commission of the United States, whose English name is: FCC, is an independent government agency directly responsible to the U.S. Congress. It was established by COMMUNICATIONACT in 1934. It is responsible for conventional interstate and international communications, such as: televisions, wires, satellites,

The work on cables involves more than 50 states in the United States, Colombia and the territories of the United States to ensure the safety of radio and wire communication products related to life and property.

On December 5, 2019, Huawei submitted an indictment in a U.S. court to sue the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.

The FCC is an independent agency of the U.S. government established in 1934.

The FCC coordinates domestic and international communications by controlling radio broadcasts, television, telecommunications, satellites and cables.

Many radio application products, communication products and digital products require FCC approval - FCC certification - to enter the US market.

The FCC committee investigates and studies all stages of product safety to find the best way to solve the problem. At the same time, the FCC also includes the detection of radio devices, aircraft, etc.

The FCC coordinates domestic and international communications by controlling radio broadcasts, television, telecommunications, satellites and cables.

Involving more than 50 states in the United States, Colombia, and regions of the United States, in order to ensure the safety of radio and wire communication products related to life and property, the FCC's Engineering and Technology Department is responsible for the technical support of the committee and is also responsible for equipment approval matters.

Many radio application products, communication products and digital products require FCC approval to enter the US market.

The FCC committee investigates and studies all stages of product safety to find the best way to solve the problem. At the same time, the FCC also includes the detection of radio devices, aircraft, etc.

The Federal Communications Commission of the United States is responsible for urging telecom operators to protect the consumer privacy of relevant phone users.

For decades, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has required telecom carriers to protect information about cell phone use.

The FCC imposes corresponding controls on mobile phone-related telecom operators. If operators use user data and information for other purposes without the consent of mobile phone users, or resell user information, they should be punished.

However, no corresponding rules exist for corresponding broadband services today.

This loophole must be closed, and broadband consumers in the 21st century should be similarly protected.

Has Huawei succeeded in suing the United States? Huawei’s lawsuit may have little effect.

Because the other party must be the government of a country.

Therefore, I personally believe that Huawei is mainly speaking out to prove that the wrong party is the United States.

Not Huawei.

If Huawei does not sue the US government.

Then those politicians in the US government will definitely slander Huawei as aggressively as possible.

And it will also make many people who don’t know the truth believe the lies of the US government.

Huawei Responds to U.S. Accusations Recently, many mainstream U.S. media outlets have speculated that the U.S. startup CNEX Labs has accused Huawei’s rotating chairman Xu Zhijun of conspiring to steal the company’s trade secrets.

According to a report in the U.S. Wall Street Journal, according to a court document in the Eastern District of Texas Federal Court, CNEX, a startup company headquartered in San Jose, California, accused Huawei of using various channels over the years, including allegedly using the assistance of a Chinese university to conspire.

Stealing the company's solid-state drive computer storage technology.

Huawei responded to this, stating that these accusations are unrelated and lack evidence.

Huawei will continue to use legal means to prove its innocence.

The following is the original text of the response: CNEX’s accusations against Huawei have no factual basis and are essentially a copycat response to Huawei’s 2017 lawsuit against CNEX and its founder.

Huawei filed a lawsuit against former employee YiRen "Ronnie" Huang in 2017.

When the employee left, he stole Huawei's information assets, poached many Huawei employees, and used Huawei's assets to establish a new company, CNEX.

Before other relevant employees left Huawei and founded/joined CNEX, they stole Huawei's confidential documents, seriously infringing Huawei's intellectual property rights.

In late 2018, after losing multiple key judgments, CNEX and Huang launched similar counterclaims against Huawei.

These accusations were directed at Xiamen University, and later CNEX also tried to link the accusations to Huawei's rotating chairman, but these accusations were baseless.

In fact, the judge in the case twice rejected CNEX’s request to involve Huawei executives in the lawsuit.

In addition, the CNEX legal team has no confidence in the accusations against Xiamen University and has not yet sought any documents or testimony from Xiamen University or its professors or personnel.

Under this situation, CNEX continued to speak out in the media to divert public attention and slander Huawei's reputation.

CNEX also tried to take advantage of the ongoing trade war by constantly emphasizing to the media that it was an "American" company, but what it failed to mention was that almost half of its employees and R&D activities came from China.

The reason why the United States is suing Huawei is that at least 73 of the 535 members of the U.S. House of Representatives are directly or indirectly shareholders of Cisco.