stocks and funds are affected by various? News? And all kinds of politics? Policy? The influence is too intense, and Zhuang? Home? What are the retail investors? Kind of game. Individual vote? It's hard for employers to be here? Inside? Always do it? Correct? Operation, so the loss is very high? Probability. And political trust? Investment has politics? Fu? Credit endorsement, so risk? Lower; And? And? Cast? What is the capital? People's livelihood projects and physical projects will have more stable returns. So political trust? Relatively speaking, it is a comparison? Suitable? Ordinary people? Investment projects? . . Your adoption has always supported me

In fact, on the whole, the main reason for this impression is the unequal risks. The risks of stocks and funds are above average, and some radical investors may even lose everything in the stock market. However, political trust investment is different, because of the government's credit endorsement and the control of professional institutions, the risk can be controlled at an infinitely low level. I have been working as a political letter for so many years, and I have hardly encountered any breach of contract. Even if I did, it would be delayed for a while. Therefore, for ordinary people, political trust investment is still a better way to manage money.

Both stocks and funds are playing with finance. On the one hand, it is your long-term or short-term expectation for this company; on the other hand, it is a game with the bookmakers, which is really not so stable. However, political trust investment is a solid investment pillar industry, such as infrastructure such as high-speed and bridges, or the new infrastructure of 5G base stations that are relatively hot recently. Relatively speaking, Zhengxin Investment is safer with the government's credit endorsement, and a professional tripartite organization like Zhengxin Investment Group controls risks, which is equivalent to another layer of insurance.

actually, on the whole, the main reason for this impression is the unequal risks. The risks of stocks and funds are above average, and some radical investors may even lose everything in the stock market. However, political trust investment is different, because of the government's credit endorsement and the control of professional institutions, the risk can be controlled at an infinitely low level. I have been working as a political letter for so many years, and I have hardly encountered any breach of contract. Even if I did, it would be delayed for a while. Therefore, for ordinary people, political trust investment is still a better way to manage money.

compared with stock funds, which provide timely feedback of risks, projects such as Zhengxin Finance, which have the government as a credit endorsement, and Zhengxin Investment Group, which is a professional institution to control risks, can basically achieve a very low default rate. And the income is not bad. I have been doing it for several years and I have really made a lot of money.

Li Qun, deputy director of the Research Center for Technological Innovation and Strategic Management of China Academy of Social Sciences, said at the recent annual summit of the government and trust industry that the government and trust investment will "standardize risk control and promote development", so the security of the government and trust investment will inevitably be more secure, and the risk will be lower than that of stock funds.