First of all, judging from the actual effect, it is really difficult to really help you to work in a bank just by taking these two certificates. I have a classmate who has worked in a bank for three years now, and even has no qualification for banking, let alone securities; On the other hand, I also have friends who have passed the qualifications of banking, securities, accounting and fund, but they still can't get into the bank (of course, to be precise, they can't get a stable and ideal position in the bank, so it's generally not a big problem if they are willing to work as a salesman in the credit card center).

secondly, it is difficult to find a job nowadays, which is well known. In this case, it is always necessary to increase your chips as much as possible. Let's just say that the bank wants to recruit a person. You and your competitors have the same other conditions, but she has the qualifications for banking and securities. In this case, she is more likely to get the job than you, right? So, it doesn't make any sense to ask if these certificates are useful. We, the respondents, are not the presidents of any bank, so we don't count. However, one more certificate is better than one less certificate, and it is better not to use it after the exam than to use it but not to take it out, so many skills are not overwhelming. Don't hate books when they are used.

I also studied finance and economics. I didn't get any certificates in college. That's what I heard at that time. Blind textual research won't help me find a job. But then I really started looking for a job, and the unit will inevitably ask you if you have a certificate in finance and economics, and I can't come up with anything. That kind of situation is very embarrassing.