1. ．SCI papers are not as difficult to write as expected

1. Be familiar with your major and experimental methods; We should respect the results, face the results realistically, and read more literature before writing, especially the recent foreign literature. I believe that as long as the results are correct, they can be explained and published.

2. For beginners, "copying" is inevitable, and the beauty lies in the skill of "copying". The writing format of research articles of the same nature is similar, so the format can be "copied". Common sentence patterns can be copied flexibly. Some descriptive and conclusive sentences are expressed and summarized in their own language as far as possible when they are read. But don't copy the original sentence that you don't understand, otherwise, the little ones will be full of jokes and the big ones will ruin the future of the article.

3. Try to use the words you are familiar with. Don't deliberately use flowery, seldom used or rare words.

4. Be willing to invest energy and time.

5. After the article is written, you must ask your tutor, boss, * * * co-author or colleagues to review it, and if necessary, you can also ask a professional service company with high credibility (such as Meijiedeng) to improve the success rate.

2. How to contribute

In fact, it is still learned which magazine the paper should be submitted to. Generally, it depends on the novelty and creativity of the subject, the integrity and reliability of the experimental results and the quality of the paper writing. If you have enough time (more than one year) to wait, you'd better vote for a magazine higher than your target magazine first, even Lancet, NEJM,JAMA, etc. These magazines either reject manuscripts directly or send them back for review (and a few accept manuscripts directly). The former is usually completed in less than a week, while the latter takes 1-2 months. So even if you reject the manuscript, you won't lose anything, but you may receive very constructive opinions or suggestions. You know, the people who review these magazines are not idle people. When they hit the nail on the head and put forward the "weakness" of the article, they often put forward many good suggestions to improve the paper. If you don't have time to wait, you want to win the paper once, but you don't want to "marry" your masterpiece, so you have to bother to choose.

3. How to choose reviewers

Many magazine editors want you to recommend 3-4 reviewers, and they are likely to send an invitation to the reviewers you recommend. Therefore, the recommended reviewers are still knowledgeable. If the reviewers you recommend are too busy or "awesome", they will simply ignore the invitation of general magazines, and your article may not find reviewers in time. In fact, the magazine does not require too much for the identity of the reviewer, but the reviewer must be an expert in a certain profession. Therefore, many authors who have published papers in a certain major will receive invitation letters for peer review. Therefore, you don't have to be too picky when recommending reviewers. Suggestions: 1. Recommend authors who have published articles with similar results and conclusions abroad; 2. Recommend the author who has cited the paper in your paper; 3. Recommend professors and associate professors of the same major that you or your boss know.

IV. About withdrawing manuscripts

Some authors need to withdraw manuscripts for various reasons, but they are worried that the editors will be unhappy and even blacklisted. In fact, this kind of worry is unnecessary. But what needs to be explained is, why did you withdraw the manuscript? Is the material method unreliable, the result can't be repeated, or is there something wrong with the design itself? These are all reasons for withdrawing the manuscript. However, at present, due to institutional reasons, many authors in China have contributed more than one manuscript. When the article was accepted by one magazine, the author began to ask other magazines to withdraw it. This behavior of multiple contributions for one manuscript is despised by foreign scholars. Because it will waste a lot of time for editors and reviewers.

5. How to deal with letters from editors

1. Rejection The rejection rate of foreign publications varies from high to low. The rejection rate of magazines with a score of more than 5 can be as high as 8%, and that of general magazines is above 3%. Therefore, if you receive such a reply, you should revise the manuscript according to the review opinions, and then submit it to other magazines according to the revised quality. It is usually invested in magazines with lower impact factors. However, if the reviewers put forward very constructive opinions and suggestions, and you feel that you have fully and reasonably answered these opinions and suggestions, you can definitely invest in a better magazine.

2. Re-submission after modification sometimes happens. It often shows that the paper is not competitive enough or even flawed. It is usually necessary to make up tests or data. The opinions of many reviewers are also inconsistent and mixed, so the editor can't decide. So it will be returned to the author for revision. At this time, the author should carefully read the opinions and suggestions of the editor and each reviewer, supplement at least one experiment suggested by the reviewer (it is certainly better to supplement all of them), and then answer every question of the reviewer reasonably. Papers submitted after revision are regarded as new contributions, and will be renumbered, which will often be re-evaluated by the original reviewers or even sent to another group of reviewers for review. However, as long as the opinions and suggestions of editors and reviewers are seriously responded, most papers will be accepted.

3. Revision (Major revision or Minor revision) The difference between revision and submission after revision is that the revised article will not be renumbered, only R1 will be added after the original number. In fact, the "overhaul" of many magazines is no less revised than the above-mentioned "revision before investment". Not easy to despise. Similarly, the revised article is likely to be sent to the original reviewer for review. Generally, there is a great chance of being accepted. The articles of "minor repairs" have generally been accepted in principle, but there are a few places that need to be confirmed and revised by the author, so they are similar to the "conditional acceptance" of some magazines (see below).

4. Accepted with or without minor revision Except for a few magazines, most magazines, especially high-quality magazines, will not "Accept as it is" the papers submitted for the first time. The best situation is "accepted with or without minor revision", that is, as long as the author agrees to make some revisions or supplements, the essay will be accepted. However, most papers are received after the first revision. Sometimes a second revision is needed. Generally, two revisions can't satisfy reviewers, and editors often reject manuscripts.

VI. How to answer the reviewer

Keep a straight mind and keep calm. Don't use the "prejudice" mentality to judge that the reviewer is "biased" or "discriminatory". Doing research is really hard, and publishing articles is really not easy. But reviewers are also very hard and not easy. They read your articles carefully and give you pertinent opinions, even good suggestions. If you blame me for a while with strong words, no one will be angry. You know, it is not difficult to find reasons to reject an article. Therefore, at this time, you must calm down, analyze and understand the opinions of the reviewers, and find out the problem.

VII. Matters after the paper is accepted

After the paper is accepted, you will receive proof sent back by the printing editor. Proofreading is not allowed to be greatly changed unless there is a principle error. When proofreading, we mainly check whether the fund number is wrong, whether the author's name is wrong, and whether the data in the chart is wrong. Some magazines are not allowed to change the manuscript after proof correction. There will be a charge for further changes, and publication will be delayed. Proofreading usually needs to be sent back to the printing editor as soon as possible. When sending proofs, publishers will ask to fill in the Transfer of Copy Right, and tell them how to pay the page fee and how to order pamphlets. In the past, most magazines didn't charge page fees. Now, with the popularity of Open access, more magazines charge page fees, but at least half of them still don't. However, at present, few people ask the author for papers, and it is easy for the author to get the pdf text of his papers from the Internet and email it to the requester.

VIII. Matters after the paper is published

Once the paper is published, it is not appropriate to retract it. In the eyes of many people, "retraction" is almost equivalent to "academic misconduct". Therefore, more than one manuscript or more than one manuscript also involves the issue of integrity, which should be carefully considered before publishing the paper. In addition, after the paper is published, you may receive a paper request letter from underdeveloped countries or domestic scholars. This shows that someone is interested in your paper. Secondly, someone may read and quote your paper, thus increasing your popularity. Many universities evaluate the level of papers according to their impact factors and the number of citations. In this regard, you should take a positive attitude and try to send them the pdf text you downloaded online by email.

do paper net, provide papers for publication, thesis title, education papers, academic papers, architectural papers and medical papers. Thesis fields: education, architecture, economy, management, social science, medicine, literature, agriculture, sports, accounting, science and technology, machinery, computer, law, art, journalism, engineering, transportation, science and engineering, nursing and other majors.