The unfair evaluation process makes the application more difficult. Gong Lei (deputy dean of Marxist College of Shanghai Normal University) has difficulty in applying for humanities and social sciences, mainly due to the following three reasons: First, there are fewer projects that can be applied. The total number lags far behind the science and engineering projects. Second, there are many restrictions on the subject. Humanities and social sciences are mostly concentrated in a certain subject field, with strong professionalism and narrow audience, and few teachers can participate in the application. Third, the comprehensive humanities and social sciences topics with a wide audience are fiercely competitive. There are a large number of applicants for national comprehensive social science projects such as the National Social Science Fund, and it is difficult for young scholars or teachers to apply successfully. In addition, although the project application process has set up many links such as anonymous review and meeting review, it is still difficult to completely avoid unfair factors in the review process, which has aggravated the difficulty of project application to some extent. For example, the familiarity between project applicants and evaluation experts will affect the evaluation results. What's more, some project applicants will take the initiative to seek the care of anonymous experts. I'm afraid this phenomenon needs to be solved by strengthening internal supervision and improving the evaluation process. Policy inclination influenced He Zhen (director of social science department of Xiangtan University, professor of management) to apply for the national social science project. Generally speaking, it is fair and just, and the funded projects are outstanding projects that reflect the domestic first-class research level, are cutting-edge and innovative, and are in a leading position in a certain field. However, the application is very difficult, mainly due to the small number of projects, low funding rate and fierce competition. In the past two years, the funding rate of the National Social Science Fund was about 10%, compared with 7%-8% in previous years, while the funding rate of the National Natural Science Fund was as high as 20%-30%. For local colleges and universities, the competition is more intense. Compared with subordinate universities, especially "985" universities, local universities have few indicators. For example, the Ministry of Education's "Outstanding Talents Support Plan for the New Century" and two subordinate universities in Hunan Province-Central South University and Hunan University, all have indicators above 20, while all other universities in Hunan Province add up to only 12. These provincial universities have made positive contributions to the development of local economy, but the inclination of policies to subordinate universities and research institutes has aggravated the difficulty of selecting topics for local universities. Local colleges and universities should start with general projects. Liu Zhao (Director of the Scientific Research Department of Changchun Normal University), the National Social Science Fund and the Humanities and Social Science Fund of the Ministry of Education have strict control over the project quality, so it is natural that the application is difficult. In particular, the National Social Science Fund has added a joint evaluation procedure in the evaluation. Experts attending the joint hearing are well-known scholars from key universities, which is even more difficult for local universities that lack well-known scholars. In this case, if local colleges want to break through the difficulties of project application, they should focus on the following aspects: First, fully understand the application process. The national social science fund is generally oriented, and it is also very particular about reporting and filling out forms. Secondly, we should attach importance to the work of selecting topics, and first carry out topic selection demonstration in schools and ask experts for guidance. Third, attach importance to the construction of talent team, introduce high-quality talents and strengthen on-the-job training for teachers. Finally, we should focus on general projects and youth projects. Obtaining scientific research projects is a great encouragement for local colleges and universities, which helps to improve teachers' enthusiasm for scientific research and improve the overall scientific research level of colleges and universities. Human factors should be reduced in project evaluation. Chen Zhiqiang (Associate Research Fellow, Research Department, Qingdao University) has limited project resources and is short of manpower. The lack of evaluation criteria for humanities and social sciences projects is also an important factor in the difficulty of project application. In many cases, judging experts score according to subjective impressions, and human factors will inevitably be added. Before each project application, judges have become a hot spot pursued by individuals, schools and related institutions. It can be seen that in order to make the evaluation of humanities and social sciences more fair, it is necessary to set up more fair and reasonable procedures and reduce human factors. According to my personal point of view, the evaluation of humanities and social sciences topics should be improved in the following aspects: (1) absorbing more experts from related majors to become judges; Set more reasonable evaluation procedures and standards; After the review, timely feedback to the applicant, tell the reasons for not passing, so that the applicant can fully understand the review. It is not unreasonable to comment on what the four teachers said.