Chen Jun thought that pearls should be his own, so he invited himself to a restaurant for dinner. Although he hasn't paid the bill yet, according to the contract law and general hotel practice, the defendant has delivered the food to the diners when he sends it to the table, and the ownership of the food has also been transferred.

The defendant's restaurant argued: First of all, the plaintiff Chen Jun and the defendant's restaurant formed an unjust enrichment legal relationship. In this case, Chen Jun and Jude Zhong ordered steamed fish in the restaurant, and neither of them took pearls as the transaction object. The sudden appearance of pearls is unjust enrichment for Chen Jun, and according to the general principles of China's civil law, Chen Jun should return the unjustly enriched pearls to the restaurant. Secondly, Chen Jun and Zhong Hui didn't pay compensation when they found it, and the steamed fish, including pearls, was not owned by them.

Wujin, as a third person, took part in the lawsuit, and he proposed to the court that the pearls belonged to him. The reason is that he salvaged the fish from the sea, and both the fish and pearls should belong to him and should be his labor income; The restaurant bought it from him.

He bought fish, and neither side knew that there were pearls in the fish's belly, so he traded with the restaurant according to the market price of the fish, and the price of pearls was not included in the fish money, so the ownership of pearls was not transferred. The hotel found that pearls were unfair and should be returned.

Talking and arguing, there is no good result.

Since we can't argue about why, let's do something good for the charity foundation! There is no loss for them, and there is no money to buy pearls.