Speaking of provident fund, people in the workplace are familiar with it. During the application process, we have a demand for provident fund. Provident funds can be used not only for renting houses, but also for loans. But apart from wages, the provident fund allocated by everyone has a lot to do with occupation and region. Recently, the national 3 1 provincial provident fund list was released, and in such a list, Tibet ranked 1 can be said to have given us a surprise.

How to rank fifth in various places is Yunnan Province, followed by Xinjiang, which is basically the same as Hubei in terms of provident fund. Qinghai is the third province in China, and Beijing occupies the second place, which has far surpassed Shanghai. Tibet ranks first in the list of provident funds. Perhaps Tibet ranks first, which many people didn't expect, but it has a lot to do with the company's attributes. The provinces at the bottom of the provident fund list are Guangdong, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Hainan, Shanxi and Shaanxi.

Such a ranking related to residents' income is definitely related to the per capita income of the region. For example, Hainan Province, which ranks lower, compares the number of people who pay the provident fund with the total number of people, and it can be seen that the number of people who pay the provident fund per capita is even less than half that of Tibet.

In addition to per capita income, it is also closely related to the type of company. For example, some companies, such as banks, petrochemical companies, tobacco companies and electric power companies, still pay relatively high provident funds to their employees. However, for the tourism catering industry, including some private service industries, the amount of provident fund paid by individuals is generally low. For Tibet, state institutions account for 46% of all units, of which state-owned enterprises account for 27%, so the vast majority of employees have stable employment. The amount of the corresponding provident fund is relatively high, and it is precisely because of this that Tibet can rank first. For Hainan, the proportion of state-owned enterprises is 14% and that of public institutions is 29%. Basically, 60% are private enterprises.

It is this economic structure and proportion that led to such a change in this ranking. Compared with other backward provinces, this ratio is relatively obvious. When the private sector accounts for a relatively large proportion, the amount of provident fund contributions will decrease accordingly.