First of all, we need to focus on Ma Yun and Alibaba. As we all know, money is the most important thing for Alibaba. In this natural and man-made disaster in Wuhan, Ali made a direct donation of 1 100 million, and is still in contact with many foreign high-quality mask companies to urgently bring medical-grade advanced masks back to Wuhan. This incident not only shows that Alibaba is particularly rich, but also shows that Ali has confidence in the country and his heart is in Wuhan.
However, not everyone is Ma Yun's. There are many internationally renowned technology companies in China, but few people make money like Ali. Fortunately, Ma's ability to make money is also very strong, so Tencent donated 300 million to the people of Wuhan in this accident. The money was donated by Tencent Foundation. Although not as rich as Ma Yun, Tencent's donation also shows his intention.
Tencent and Ali are the most famous technology companies in China, but also the two most profitable technology companies in China. Except for these two big companies, although other technology companies have improved, their profitability is definitely not comparable. So first of all, Huawei, which has donated a lot, has sold a lot of mobile phones at home and abroad, and even the overall sales volume of mobile phones has reached the second place in the world. Huawei has also blossomed globally in 5G construction. Unfortunately, its profitability is still in its infancy.
So in the end, Huawei gave a donation figure of 30 million. Of course, Huawei has also done some other network laying help for Wuhan. At present, the donation figure of Xiaomi is100000, even lower than Huawei. Although it looks quite big, it depends on the contrast. After all, Huawei Xiaomi is similar to Ali Tencent in word of mouth, but now the donation is an order of magnitude worse, so the donations of these two companies have been met with many people's eyes.
However, I have to mention the problems mentioned before. Alibaba Tencent is an established enterprise with a large background and is indeed the most profitable company. Huawei Xiaomi seems to be inferior in this respect, so it really doesn't have that much money. Sometimes it may be as simple as this, the donation will be less and not too stingy, so don't just be a keyboard man. Maybe people have made other contributions behind what you can't see.
It is worth mentioning that there is an unconfirmed gossip that Samsung is going to donate 70 million yuan to Wuhan, twice as much as Huawei and seven times as much as Xiaomi. As a company that has been so miserable in China, is Samsung's sudden move out of humanitarian support or in the hope of saving its reputation in China? We don't know this. After all, this is just a gossip. It is not known whether Samsung will donate.
In fact, when you mention this, you have to think of moral kidnapping. Many people are used to moral kidnapping and don't think there is anything wrong with it. It seems that others have so much capital that it is necessary to donate more assets. This is what China called an old saying. The greater the ability, the greater the responsibility. If we judge this China proverb from the correct angle, it seems that it is true and Ma Yun insists on it.
But the problem is that not everyone is Ma Yun, and everyone has different attitudes and angles. Of course, there is another point that needs to be taken seriously. Ma Yun's insistence is not necessarily correct. For example, the tiger is the king of the forest, so does it have the obligation to take care of an ant with a broken leg? Even in the same ethnic group, wolves may not take care of the injured cubs, because wolves may be facing enemies at this time, and wolves must leave their cubs to protect the whole wolves.
In fact, this kind of multiple-choice question has been mentioned more than once. There is a story that there are 49 people on the train that lost its brakes, and 5 1 person is lying on the track. As long as this track is moved, 49 people on the train will die, but 5 1 person on the track can be saved. On the contrary, 5 1 people on the tracks will die. So what should you do? From the scale alone, you should definitely save 5 1 person, but are you qualified to kill 49 people on the train?
One truth that this short story tells us is that everything in the world is viewed from many different angles, and there are also many different angles to see problems. Nothing is black and white. Even if Huawei Xiaomi doesn't try his best, perhaps these companies will leave more money in the company for research and development, so that the domestic technology industry will stand at the top of the world earlier in the future.