the main writing of "Application for Re-examination of Refusal to Bid Booklet" should be standardized with sufficient reasons.

mainly pay attention to the following points, and fully explain them:

1. The applied trademark is a commercial logo designed by the applicant, which has the distinctiveness of a registered trademark and can be registered as a trademark.

second, overall observation and comparison of the main parts are the basic principles of trademark examination. To judge whether two trademarks are similar, we should balance these two principles, comprehensively apply them and make an objective evaluation.

third, the applied trademark is completely different from the main identification part (cited), and the appearance of the graphic part is far from the same. The call and meaning combined with the whole are significantly different, giving consumers a completely different overall impression, which is enough for consumers to distinguish. The use of similar services will not lead to confusion and misunderstanding of consumers, and should not be judged as similar trademarks

4. The following trademarks are very similar to the application for trademarks and cited trademarks in this case, but they have been successfully registered in similar groups, which will not cause misunderstanding and confusion of the relevant public in the actual use process. I urge you to uphold the consistent trial standards and approve the application for trademark registration.

comparison table of each trademark * * *

v. Whether the applied trademark and the cited trademark are similar should be compared comprehensively, and the whole trademark and related elements should be compared

VI. Based on the legislative purpose of China's Trademark Law, the application for trademark registration does not conflict with any trademark. And it is significant and recognizable, and the normal and legal registration of trademarks should be protected.