Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - When the cpc patent electronic application client sends it, it prompts that the network fault cannot be connected.
When the cpc patent electronic application client sends it, it prompts that the network fault cannot be connected.
There is something wrong with the electronic application network. It is the network system crash. Can't be solved. This is a web system crash that needs to be corrected by official insiders.

We can only wait for the webpage to be repaired.

What do you need to know about cpc patent application? 20 10, 10, the United States and Europe announced that they would jointly formulate a joint patent classification system (CPC). It is developed according to the standard and structure of international classification system IPC.

Taking the European patent classification number ECLA as the basis of the whole classification system, combined with the successful practical experience of the US patent classification USPC, it is jointly managed and maintained by the European Patent Office and the US Patent and Trademark Office. The United States Patent and Trademark Office promised to give up its USPC for nearly 200 years after the implementation of CPC.

Extended data:

The exhaustion of patent rights is the product of American judicial precedent in the19th century, which has a history of more than 60 years. The system began in brummer case of 1852, and its basic principle was established in Adams case of 1873. At present, it has become the basic defense of patent infringement.

In the case of Bloomer v. McQuewan, the Supreme Court of the United States expounded the reasonable compensation theory of the principle of exhaustion of patent rights, and held that the application of the principle of exhaustion of patent rights was mainly due to two basic motives: the expectation of preventing the patentee from obtaining unfounded compensation and the extreme distrust of imposing permanent restrictions on personal property. If the patentee gets reasonable compensation, he can't continue to control the patented product under the pretext of patent right.