I have the following answers to the questions in the title.
1. Do you think their LOGO are similar? I think the LOGO of the two are very similar, but they are not exactly similar.
Look at the picture, the LOGO of these two brands are composed of two vertical semicircles, both of which are a circle with two intersecting circles inside.
In fact, to be honest, I think the two LOGO are completely irrelevant and do not conflict, but the content structure is similar, which will not make people feel similar at a glance.
I think Chanel was a little touched by porcelain.
Second, whether it is infringement. In 20 19, Chanel sued Huawei, or sued in the European Union, which obviously meant bullying, but Huawei finally won the case.
The Trademark Office rejected Chanel's appeal on 20 19, saying that there was no similarity and it was impossible to cause confusion in the public mind.
Later, Chanel was not convinced, once again questioned the Luxembourg court and rejected Chanel's appeal again. After that, the General Court of Justice of the European Union held that the trademarks were similar to some extent, but the appearance was very different, and lost the case again.
This trademark lawsuit started on 20 17, and Chanel lost again and again.
Third, my opinion. This trademark of Huawei is a registered computer trademark filed in the European Intellectual Property Office on 20 17, so Chanel feels that it is infringing.
I think Chanel is contacting Huawei in China. What is Huawei's measure and Chanel's measure? There is no contrast between a global high-tech enterprise and a global luxury enterprise, so I think even similarity is a blessing for Chanel. This is not only not stealing, but also very appealing. I believe it, too.
Like this trademark, it can be said that Huawei has no infringement, but Chanel thinks it is similar. In other words, the above two can't be said to be exactly the same, but they can only be said to be irrelevant.