Opinions vary, who is genuine? I believe everyone is familiar with the word Muji. Beijing Muji and Japan Muji have been fighting for a long time and have been tit for tat. It is reported that the trademark of MUJI is registered at 200 1. Subsequently, in 2004, Beijing Miantian Textile obtained the trademark. However, Japanese MUJI only entered the China market in 2005. Because of the different timelines, we have been able to see the whole picture of some things.
Contradictory node, to what extent is the relationship between the two sides tense? The contradictory node is the discovery of Japanese Muji in Beijing, using the word Muji. Later, the two met in court, and the atmosphere was tense, as if to eat each other alive. However, the lawsuit filed by Beijing Muji was not successful. The court held that Japanese MUJI did not constitute plagiarism. Obviously, Beijing MUJI is not satisfied with this result. Beijing MUJI didn't give up, filed a lawsuit many times and finally succeeded. It is understood that Japanese MUJI raised an objection to the trademark, but it was refuted many times. Although the lawsuit was finally filed and passed the first and second trials, it failed in the end.
What is the truth? Beijing MUJI and Japan MUJI have been fighting for a long time, and they both hate each other's existence. In the eyes of the majority of netizens, it's just a drop in the bucket, one is a cottage, the other is a high price and low quality, and there's nothing to compete for. Netizens have different opinions about the confrontation between the two. Just like the most typical case, Oreo, as the largest copy, is even more popular than the original. We also need to see that shanzhai is not necessarily completely wrong. To see the essence through appearances, you can't just stick to one side. Everything has two sides. Fake is not necessarily bad, but really not necessarily good.