The same level of micro-single and SLR use the same level of sensors and processors, and the lenses are slightly different, but they are basically the same level, so there is no saying that the micro-single shooting effect is not as good as SLR. The main difference between micro-single and SLR is the way of framing and focusing. Regarding framing, generally speaking, SLR is to stick eyes on the camera frame, while micro-sheet is generally viewed from the screen behind the camera like a general card machine. Compared with the two methods, SLR is more energy-saving and micro-single is more intuitive. As for focusing, simply speaking, the focusing speed of SLR is faster, but the focusing area is limited to a few specific points. The focusing speed of the micro-single is slightly slower, but it can focus on the whole picture and focus more accurately. Now some micro-cameras have a hybrid focusing system, which combines the advantages of both. Although this technology is immature, it has been put into practical use.

As for the weight problem you mentioned, there is no essential difference between the two for your purpose. The reason why the micro-sheet is light must be matched with the corresponding small lens, which is usually called the biscuit head. On the one hand, these lenses are not very cheap, on the other hand, they are almost all fixed-focus lenses (commonly known as unable to zoom in and out), so it is not convenient for you to use them when traveling. If equipped with a larger lens, even the micro-single will not look so light, just a little better than the SLR, but whether it is the micro-single or the SLR, as long as you don't choose the biscuit head, you have to prepare a bag for it.

As for the post-voting problem, the two are the same. The amount of investment does not depend on whether you buy a micro-single or a SLR, but on your demand for photography. The main cost is the lens, because both are interchangeable lens cameras. If you don't want to change the lens, whether it's a SLR or a micro-single, there is no question of how much to invest in the later stage. To change lenses, there are many people who spend tens of thousands of dollars to adjust German lenses to play micro-orders, let alone micro-orders. Some people even provide a card machine with tens of thousands of pieces of equipment, studios and lighting. Therefore, the late investment depends on people rather than SLR or micro-single.

Some people upstairs say that the micro single-screen SLR has a large space in the later stage. It can be said responsibly that there is no such thing. Both the micro-single and SLR of the same brand use the same sensor and image processor, and the screen is almost the same. There is a lot of space in the later stage because there are files in RAW format, and both micro-single and SLR can store files in this format.

As for the price budget, it is no problem to buy a micro-single or SLR in 3-4k, but you can only buy a door cover machine, and the picture quality will not bring you much surprise. I hope you are mentally prepared. You'd better go to the physical store to see the real machine before making a decision. I personally suggest that you buy high-end DC products, such as Panasonic LX7 and Canon G 15. If I choose between micro-single and SLR, I think girls should be more suitable. Again, before making a decision, go to the physical store to see the real machine. Don't listen to products recommended by the store that you don't understand. If you really can't make up your mind, just write down a few items of interest and ask again. Don't start blindly.