However, administrative regulations regulate administrative matters, including administrative licensing, administrative punishment and administrative compulsory measures.

Take Li's illegal printing of trademarks as an example

If Li's illegal printing of well-known brand trademarks does not constitute a crime, it involves two parts: one is tort liability in civil law, and the other is administrative license and administrative punishment in administrative law.

There is a civil relationship between Li and the enterprise infringed by him: that is, the tort liability arising from illegally printing trademarks, which is a relationship within the scope of civil law.

There is no infringement between Li and the administrative organ, but Li's behavior violates the administrative license and should be subject to administrative punishment.

So, the problem with this topic is: Li was fined.

Fine is a typical administrative punishment measure, which is of course the adjustment scope of administrative law.

Note that if the title is: Li illegally printed trademarks, it may not fall within the scope of administrative regulations.

The core content of this topic is that Li was punished, and the middle paragraph is only the reason, not the topic requirement. However, there is no fine in civil law, and it can only be one of the administrative punishments (especially after the abolition of the regulations on rewards and punishments for employees, fines can only be the content of administrative law, so we should pay attention to the difference between fines in criminal law).