This case was in 2007 and has been decided. The defendant was ordered to stop the infringement and compensate, and the plaintiff won the case. I'll give you two links about this case.

/desktop module/bulletin MDL/bul content view . aspx？ BulID=2226

/infor_vewe.asp？ infor _ id = 35972 & ampclass 1 _ id = 16 & amp； class2_id=6 1

If it is too long, let me briefly summarize the reasons:

The first is that the defendant's trademark is similar to the plaintiff's trademark in the registration category, and the second is that the main part of the text is similar, which will lead to confusion among consumers and thus infringe on the plaintiff's legitimate interests.