I don’t know what you are struggling with?

Consumer contracts shall be governed by the law of the place of the consumer’s habitual residence; if the consumer chooses to apply the law of the place where the goods or services are provided or the operator does not engage in relevant business activities in the place of the consumer’s habitual residence, the law of the place where the goods or services are provided shall apply. local law. Hasn’t it been said clearly?

If the consumer chooses the place where the goods and services are provided, the place where the goods and services are provided shall apply. Similarly, if the operator does not engage in relevant business activities in the place of the consumer’s habitual residence, the laws of the place where the goods and services are provided shall apply. Where does the understanding that “the law of the place of habitual residence of the consumer be applicable no matter what happens to a consumer contract” comes from? !

For product liability, the law of the place of habitual residence of the infringed party shall apply; if the infringed party chooses to apply the law of the infringer's main place of business or the law of the place where the damage occurred, or the infringer does not engage in relevant activities in the place of habitual residence of the infringed party For business activities, the law of the infringer’s main place of business or the law of the place where the damage occurred shall apply.

What is your understanding: "Can consumer contracts and product liability infringements be unconditionally applied to the law of the habitual residence of the consumer and the law of the habitual residence of the infringed party as stated in the first sentence of the law?" Yes The problem is that under normal circumstances, the law of the place of habitual residence of the consumer and the law of the place of habitual residence of the infringed party are applied. They are not unconditionally applicable. Except for independent choices, if the operator does not engage in relevant business activities in the place of habitual residence of the consumer, the goods and services shall be applicable. The law of the place of provision; if the infringer does not engage in relevant business activities in the place of habitual residence of the infringed party, the law of the infringer's main place of business or the law of the place where the damage occurred shall apply.

"If the consumer has no choice, just follow the law and apply the law of the consumer's place of habitual residence. Wouldn't it be over?" Why is it over? ! Applying to the place of habitual residence of consumers is conducive to protecting the legitimate rights of consumers and helping consumers safeguard their rights. How can it be "finished"? ! When there is no choice, the law of the place of habitual residence of the consumer generally applies. However, if the operator does not engage in relevant business activities in the place of habitual residence of the consumer, the law of the place where the goods or services are provided shall apply.