The plaintiff’s grounds for action.

1. The plaintiff believes that its trademark Yuecheng enjoys high popularity and good goodwill. The trademark Yuecheng Xinyuan used by the defendant is similar to its trademark, which is easy to cause confusion and infringes its trademark rights.

2. The plaintiff believes that the defendant’s unauthorized use of similar trademarks without its permission has constituted infringement, and requests the court to order it to stop the infringement and compensate for corresponding economic losses and reasonable expenses. The defendant's main defense.

1. The defendant believes that there are obvious differences between its trademark Yuecheng Xinyuan and the plaintiff’s trademark Yuecheng, which will not cause confusion and does not constitute trademark infringement.

2. The defendant believed that it had used the trademark earlier and clearly pointed out the word "Xinyuan" in its advertisements. There was no malicious imitation of the plaintiff's trademark.