Did Foolish Old Man move mountains or people?

Both sides of the debate: Sichuan team (pro) VS Hunan team (con)

Professor’s point of view: Did Foolish Old Man move people? Shan

Contrary point of view: Foolish Old Man is an immigrant

Positive debaters: Chen Tingjie in the first debate of Cangxi Baijiang, Jin Jiyue in the second debate of Pengxi Baijiang, Wang Quanzhong in Ziyang Baijiang in the third debate, and Baijiang in the fourth debate. Invest in Li Feng

Opposition debaters: Tu Yanqun in Chenzhou Baijiang in the first debate, Luosong in Baijiang in Yunnan in the second debate, Nanbinqin in Baijiang in the third debate, and Bi Zhengliang in Baijiang Changsha in the fourth debate

Judges: Qiqihar Baijiang Liu Haidong, Benxi Baijiang Xu Lijun, Qingyuan Baijiang Wang Pinhui, Nanjing Baijiang Xuzhong, Nanjing Baijiang Xuchun, Baijiang Investment Gao Rongxiang, Baijiang Investment Cong Shufeng

□ State the argument

The first argument of the affirmative: Dear host, fellow debaters, and colleagues, hello everyone! On the question of whether Foolish Old Man moved mountains or people, our point of view is: Foolish Old Man moved mountains. I will discuss it from the following five aspects:

1. Yu Gong Yishan faces up to the difficulties in life, does not avoid the contradictions that exist in reality, and does everything based on reality. Relocation is a typical behavior of escaping from contradictions, a selfish approach that treats the symptoms but not the root cause, and is a metaphysical point of view.

2. Yu Gong chose to move mountains and face up to the contradiction, which not only solved the problem of "detours in and out", but also provided a broader development space for his hometown.

3. The spirit of perseverance and endless struggle demonstrated by Yu Gong Yishan has become the main body of the Chinese national spirit. In history, when our motherland faced invasion by foreign enemies, if there were not countless people like Yu Gong who fought and sacrificed, would we still be sitting here participating in the debate competition today?

4. After Yu Old Man Moved the Mountains, transportation became more convenient, which was more conducive to information and material exchanges with the outside world. Because productivity cannot be developed without solving the traffic problem.

5. The process of Foolish Old Man moving mountains is actually a microcosm of human society transforming nature and overcoming difficulties in the process of development. The "Foolish Old Man Moves Mountains Spirit" can enable the continuous development and progress of productivity. If Foolish Old Man does not move the mountain, he will not only succumb to difficulties, but more importantly, he will lose the opportunity to develop in the face of challenges.

In short, no matter in what era, Yugong Moves the Mountains is a spirit worthy of promotion and development. It also reflects the team spirit of Yugong and his family who have firm beliefs, work together, and take the overall situation into consideration. I believe that in the future study and life, fellow debaters will work with us to prove this truth countless times with practice, that is, "the development and progress of society requires a foolish old man to move mountains."

Opposite argument: Thank you, Chairman, and good morning, everyone! Be clear about the origin and clarify the origin. Today our debate topic is "Did Yu Gong move mountains or people?" This debate topic is not discussing whether Yu Gong's spirit is worthy of admiration, but whether Yu Gong's methods are advisable. What we should debate is Yu Gong's analysis. Whether the way of thinking about the problem is correct and whether the method chosen to solve the problem is reasonable. Therefore, both parties in today's debate choose what they think is the optimal solution based on whether it is better for Yu Gong to move mountains or to move people. Our view is that "Yu Gong is to move people" for three reasons:

First, the other debater just mentioned the importance of the Foolish Old Man spirit, but from a logical point of view, having a commendable spirit does not mean that it should be done, and there is no logical connection between the two. According to the perspective of dialectical materialism, human subjective initiative is important, but it must be based on respect for objective laws, otherwise it will be counterproductive. To succeed, you must not only dare to do it, but also do it well. Even if we talk about spirit, we must comprehensively analyze the connotation of the "Foolish Old Man Spirit". For example, the spirits such as "man can conquer nature" and "paternalistic authority" contained in it are worthy of reflection.

Second, we believe that "Yugong is an immigrant" because "doing the right thing is more important than doing the right thing." We, like our friends on the other side, also believe that only by firm belief and sufficient confidence can great achievements be achieved, but the premise is that the goals and ideas must be correct. Yu Gong moved mountains because inconvenient transportation affected his quality of life. But can improving transportation only move mountains? Is it possible to move mountains? It was precisely because Yugong Yishan's goal was incorrect and the project lacked feasibility that he received a performance appraisal result of "Praiseworthy spirit, poor ability". In the finale of the story "Foolish Old Man Moves the Mountain", the mountain was not moved by Yugong, but by "the emperor ordered Kua'e's two sons to carry two mountains".

Chairman Chen Wei has long said, "There has never been a savior. We do our own things, we can do our own things, and we can do our own things well." Therefore, when we are doing project research or decision-making analysis, we must first judge what is the right thing with a rational attitude and scientific method, and then do it right.

Third, Yugong Yiren embodies the scientific spirit of seeking adaptability amidst pragmatism and seeking development amidst adaptability. After conducting a "SWOT" analysis of Yu Gong's living environment and available resources, we determined that the solution to Yu Gong's "detours in and out" problem was to "move in". The "relocation" program is low-cost, effective, and feasible; it pays attention to environmental protection, respects human nature, and has a win-win mentality and awareness of resource integration. Moving people means breaking the closed and rigid thinking mode and promoting the thinking mode of combining functions, with the goal of creating a harmonious society between man and nature.

Based on the above points, we believe that "Yugong is an immigrant."

Second argument from the affirmative: Our point of view: Foolish Old Man is about moving mountains. In the long history of human development, spanning five thousand years and eight thousand miles, every human progress has been achieved by facing up to difficulties and fighting against them. Just like our Baijiang in the process of development, we will also encounter difficulties of one kind or another. If we avoid and shrink from difficulties as soon as we encounter them, Baijiang will not be able to develop to the glory it is today, let alone go from one country to another. Glory leads to another glory. In the face of difficulties, Yu Gong faced them with a responsible attitude, which reflected Yu Gong's simple outlook on life and value pursuit. Only when we Baijiang people have the most basic mental state and responsible inner qualities as a group and individuals can Baijiang become a gas expert in the true sense. Yu Gong lived in an era when mankind was in a period of ignorance. In the face of the powerful nature, few people had the courage and confidence to face it. Yu Gong not only faced the reality of life, but also clarified his own unique insights, that is, "Zi Zi" The spirit of "endless descendants". Such courage and courage were far beyond those of Yu Gong's era, and greatly inspired people's fighting spirit. Today, we should inherit the spirit of Foolish Old Man who moved mountains, keep digging mountains, create greater wealth for mankind, and make greater contributions to mankind.

The second argument of the negative side: Our first argument has been elaborated from a logical perspective. Below I will explain my point of view theoretically:

In the historical environment where Yugong was at that time, what Yugong wanted to solve was the traffic problem. Today's debate question actually gave Yu Gong two choices. One was to move mountains, and the other was to move people. In the face of choices, how do we think rationally and make rational choices? The key is the method! What is the standard for measuring whether a method is advisable? Economic theory tells us that the standard is "low cost, high efficiency, low input, high output."

As far as Yu Old Man Moves Mountains is concerned, first of all, in order to solve the traffic problem, Yu Old Man and his descendants wasted their time on digging rocks and moving soil, which was a huge waste of manpower, material resources, and financial resources, and the cost was huge. Life is only once for everyone. Should this once-in-a-lifetime be used to move mountains? If the other friend unfortunately becomes the descendant of Yu Gong, can you still stand here and insist on your point of view?

Secondly, Yu Gong violated scientific laws and was objectively impossible to succeed. It should be noted that "Taihang and Wangwu Mountains are 700 miles square and 10,000 ren high." A rough calculation shows that the two mountains contain approximately 234 trillion tons of earth and stone. Yu Gong transported the earth to "the end of the Bohai Sea and the north of the hidden earth". He could only go back and forth once a year, with 5 tons each time, and it would take 5,000 10 billion years. Scientists tell us that the total lifespan of the earth is about 10 billion years. In other words, when humans have moved their homes to space, Yu Gong has not destroyed a corner of the mountain!

Once again, Yu Gong moved the mountains and destroyed the beautiful natural environment and destroyed the ecological balance. Today, when ecological awareness is increasingly valued, we do not advocate the foolish old man’s method of solving problems. "Man is nurtured by heaven and earth, and the spirit of all things" should ensure that man and nature live in harmony and be virtuous. If the ground is dug indiscriminately because of the "circuitous way in and out", wouldn't it be like "thousands of birds will fly away from the mountains, and thousands of people will disappear"? Today, when we advocate harmonious development and harmonious society, do we still need to move mountains?

Let’s analyze the situation of Yu Gong’s migration.

First of all, it may only take a few days and a half for Yugong to move out of the mountains, which solves the transportation problem and is low-cost and high-efficiency!

Secondly, whether it is moving people or mountains, its ultimate goal is to better communicate with the outside world.

Since the problem to be solved is the same, we must choose a method that is both realistic and feasible. Yiren embodies the spirit of seeking truth from facts. Creating openness and mobility is where historical progress lies. Since moving mountains is so laborious and wastes money, it is better to move people based on reality.

On the one hand, it is twice the effort to move mountains but in vain; on the other hand, it is twice the result with half the effort; on the other hand, it is the hard work and sweat of moving mountains; on the other hand, it is the great wisdom and courage of moving; on the other hand, it is the helplessness of closing the mountain village, On one side is the wonderful world outside. Whichever way you go, I believe you will make a wise choice.

To sum up, we think Yugong should be moved.

Three arguments: "The Foolish Old Man Moves the Mountains" is a famous fable in ancient my country. This story is a household name. Our teachers have taught us since childhood that we must not be discouraged when encountering difficulties. We must learn from Yu Gong’s spirit of not being afraid of hardship or any difficulty; the spirit of daring to transform nature and conquering it; the spirit of daring to fight and dare to win. Foolish Old Man Moves Mountains is about emancipating the mind and pioneering and innovating. This is thinking about things that others did not dare to think about, and doing things that others did not dare to do. The Yugong family holds hoes and baskets, isn't it just to move mountains? Today, don’t we also advocate this spirit of emancipating the mind, pioneering innovation, and bold practice? Doesn’t Baijiang culture also have the word “creation”?

Throughout Chinese history, there are many examples that prove that Foolish Old Man can move mountains.

1. At the Seventh National Congress of the Communist Party of China more than 60 years ago, Mao Zedong used the story of the Foolish Old Man to Move Mountains to unite and lead the broad masses of the people to overcome all difficulties and obstacles and remove the three obstacles that were weighing on us. A "big mountain" and achieved revolutionary victory.

2. The famous Dujiangyan in Sichuan. The water flow in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River used to be turbulent. After entering Guanxian County, the terrain suddenly became low and flat, the water slowed down, and a large amount of sand and gravel carried by it were deposited, silting up the river, and often causing flooding. . Under the auspices of Li Bing and his son, they led the migrant workers to move away from the pile, and built dikes and dams on the pile to disperse the water flow of the Minjiang River, which not only prevented floods, but also facilitated shipping and irrigation, making Chengdu The plains have become a "land of abundance" with guaranteed harvests despite droughts and floods. To this day, the people on the Chengdu Plain still enjoy the wonderful life created by the ancients. This shows that Li Bing and his son made the right decision to move mountains at that time. Foolish Old Man's practice of moving mountains has been worthy of admiration for thousands of years.

3. Isn’t the Qinghai-Tibet Railway, which we call the Heavenly Road today, the best embodiment of moving mountains? If there was no Yugong Yishan today, could the train automatically travel through the mountains? It was because of the foolish spirit of our builders that we built the Qinghai-Tibet Railway in just a few years.

Let’s look at the example of Yu Gong’s migration.

In the late Qing Dynasty, Li Hongzhang’s "Westernization Movement" was a typical example of Foolish Old Man emigration. He bought machines, set up factories, and sent people abroad to solve the situation in old China where the great powers were looking around, the national power was declining, and the country was precarious. Faced with the closed-door "mountain" that the feudal monarchy claimed to be a celestial dynasty, he chose what he considered a less damaging and low-cost approach, which was to move people without moving mountains. The final result was the signing of a series of power-losing treaties, which led to the complete collapse of the Qing rule.

The most valuable quality reflected in the fable of Yu Gong Moves the Mountain is the firm confidence of Yu Gong’s family and the team spirit of unity and concerted efforts. Doesn’t this reflect the theme of our forum, “Professional Team”?

Therefore, I reiterate our point of view: Foolish Old Man can move mountains.

The three opposing arguments: The previous one and two arguments from our side fully proved from the perspective of logic and theory that Yu Gong moved people instead of mountains, and the answer is obvious. Now let us return to history and reality to see whether Yu Gong moved mountains or people.

We believe that Foolish Old Man Moves Mountains is an act that violates objective laws and one-sided emphasis on subjective initiative. History has taught the Chinese people a profound lesson in this regard. Let’s go back to the tragic year of 1958: With the spirit of Foolish Old Man to Move Mountains, the Chinese people put forward the slogan “Man can conquer nature” and launched a nationwide steel-making operation. Grain output was exaggerated four times, the national economy was paralyzed, and a large number of Chinese people died due to malnutrition. Census figures released by the Chinese government put the death toll from famine caused by the Great Leap Forward at 35 million. 35 million, what a terrifying number! This "Great Leap Forward" was like a foolish old man moving mountains. In the past three to five years, more people died of starvation than the total number of people who died from natural disasters in the Chinese nation in the previous 2,000 years.

What a catastrophe!

Why did such a tragedy occur in Chinese history? This is exactly the same mistake people made at that time as Foolish Old Man moved mountains. They blindly believed that subjective initiative can create everything and did not respect objective laws.

On the contrary, we believe that the cost of immigration is low and the benefits are high, which has been fully proven by history and reality. Foolish Old Man once said that his descendants would have endless needs. Let us take a look at what Foolish Old Man's descendants are doing. In order to improve the living environment and protect the ecological balance, the descendants of Yu Gong, the hometown of Yu Gong, in Jiyuan City, Henan Province, moved nearly 4,500 people out of the mountains and developed Wangwu Taihang into a tourist resort, and their living conditions were completely improved. Coincidentally, the millions of immigrants from the Three Gorges Project created a miracle in the history of human reservoir immigration. Is this a historical coincidence? No, great thinkers have pointed out this point long ago. "Book of Changes" says: poverty leads to change, change leads to generalization, and generalization leads to long-term development. When people encounter difficulties, they must find ways to change. Only by changing can they continue to develop and achieve success.

Our liquefied gas companies in Baijiang are currently exploring changes in new retail models. Isn’t this precisely because Baijiang people understand the hard truth of flexibility and long-term development? Besides, if all of our professional managers cling to the foolish peasant mentality and are stuck in their own ways, then how can we, each of us expatriates who have left their hometowns, feel like this?

Facts speak louder than words. On the one hand, there is devastation and starvation caused by Foolish Old Man’s move of mountains. On the other hand, it is the peaceful and prosperous life and long-term development that people can achieve by moving mountains. History and reality fully prove our point of view: Foolish Old Man moved people and moved people. Not moving mountains.

□ Attack and Defence Questions

Four Defences: In the face of difficulties, should we emphasize people's subjective initiative, or should we seek truth from facts and solve them with scientific methods?

Fourth debate: I think the question you asked deviates from the topic. Is the topic of our debate moving mountains or people? Our first three debaters have proven a very simple truth from all aspects. It is certain to move mountains, but they cannot move people with hoes.

The first argument of the affirmative: The Tibetan area of ??our country is facing Mount Everest, which should be said to be higher and larger than the Taihang Mountains and Wangwu Mountains. Do you want all the people living in Tibet to move to the Central Plains?

Three opposing arguments: I think everyone has seen the scene describing the Himalayas played by Ge You in "See You or Be Parted". Does that mean that by moving the Himalayas, the living conditions of the Tibetan people can be improved? Xu Benyu was one of the top ten people who moved China in 2004. After graduating from university, he gave up his prosperous urban life and went deep into the mountains to teach, shouldering responsibilities that he should not have shouldered. His spirit is like Foolish work is also very commendable. But I would like to ask my fellow debater, should each of us be like Xu Benyu and go to the mountains to teach? Then none of us would have to sit here for a meeting.

Four arguments: You are using strong words to make excuses. During the eight years of the war of resistance, if we were to immigrate people, let me ask my fellow debater, are we going to immigrate across the country?

The opposing side argued: But don’t forget, fellow debaters on the other side, wasn’t the Red Army’s 25,000-mile Long March just about relocating people?

Four Arguments: No, the Red Army’s 25,000-mile Long March was about moving mountains. It was about using appropriate methods to move the “three big mountains” above our heads.

Three arguments from the opposing side: Yes, the purpose of the opponent’s debaters is the same as ours, which is to move the "three mountains", but the premise is that the people must be moved first before the mountains can be moved.

□ Free Debate

Four arguments for the affirmative: Just now, the opponent’s fellow debaters have put forward many of their arguments and arguments, but we think that their arguments and arguments have deviated from today’s debate. theme. The topic of our debate today is whether Yu Gong is moving mountains. We have proven from all aspects that Yu Gong is moving mountains. The fable itself also tells us that when they moved the mountain, God was moved, and God sent two gods to move the mountain away. This story also illustrates the fact that moving mountains is a real and unchangeable fact.

Three opposing arguments: Why is it said that Foolish Old Man Moves the Mountains is a fable? Yu means metaphor or image. Does this mean that Foolish Old Man Moved the Mountain? If there really is history that can prove that Foolish Old Man moved mountains, then do we still need to debate here today?

The affirmative's argument: China's reform and opening up will face many problems. If this is your attitude, I suggest you buy four air tickets to go to the United States.

Opposition debate: If we follow the other side’s views, should we walk to Beijing to participate in the debate today?

Four opposing debates: Just now, the opponent’s fellow debater said that moving mountains is done in a responsible manner. Are you responsible for your descendants? Are you responsible for nature?

The first argument of the affirmative: The story of the Foolish Old Man who moved the mountains inspired the Chinese people's fighting spirit to overthrow the "three mountains". I would like to ask my fellow debater, isn't this something we should carry forward?

Four counter-arguments: Did they act recklessly? What they pay attention to is a method, comrade!

Four arguments: At work and in life, in fact, many times we make excuses in the way we deal with things. Your move is actually an excuse, an excuse to escape reality and difficulties.

Anti-party debate: If the other side of the debate says that emigration means running away, then why do you say that the spirit of the Three Gorges immigration is the patriotism that cooperates with the overall situation, the dedication of self-sacrifice for the public, and the spirit of cooperation with all people? What about the hard-working spirit of entrepreneurship?

Four arguments for the positive: What you mentioned about the Three Gorges resettlement actually proves that we are moving mountains. We are moving people away and then building dams.

Three opposing debates: Remind the opposing debater that what you just said about removing people is not exactly our point of view?

Four arguments for the positive: You are changing the concept.

An argument from the opposing side: The Three Gorges Project also requires methods. Dayu's water management focused on dredging rather than blocking. This is the way to follow nature and respect objective laws. Yu Gong Yishan is not a super girl, she can sing whenever she wants.

Four arguments: The so-called sparing and blocking are actually two methods. This can only prove that Yu Gong Yishan uses blocking to deal with problems, but in the end Yu Gong Yishan still moves mountains.

An argument from the opposing side: But the data has shown that when the earth is finished, the mountains have not yet been moved. If the mountains have love, the mountains will also grow old!

Four Arguments: Foolish Old Man Moves Mountains is actually looking at problems from a development perspective and making progress with each passing day. He even proposed moving mountains when he was 90 years old.

Three objections: Precisely because he is 90 years old, we are wondering whether he has Alzheimer's disease.

Four Arguments: This is exactly the spirit we want to promote, the spirit of self-sacrifice and not being afraid of difficulties.

Opposition debate: I would like to ask my fellow debater, is Yugong an idealist or a materialist?

Second argument: He is a combination of idealism and realism.

Three opposing arguments: The opponent just mentioned in the first argument that Yu Gong moved mountains based on reality, and moved people to avoid conflicts. We think Yu Gong’s idea is too selfish. He himself wants to move mountains and then impose his ideas on his descendants. Isn't this the behavior of a feudal tyrant? Do we still need to learn from his spirit?

Three arguments for the right: The most valuable quality reflected in the fable of Yu Old Man Moving the Mountain is Yu Old Man’s firm belief and the spirit of teamwork. This is just as we all saw today in the theme of Baijiang Forum: Professional quality, professional team.

Opposition debate: I would like to ask the opposing debater, when the Titanic encountered an iceberg, did it hit the iceberg and move it away, or did it go around it?

Four positive arguments: The example you gave deviates from the topic to be debated today.

Three opposing arguments: We believe that this example is inevitably related to today’s debate topic. What the other party argued just now is that we must have firm and sufficient confidence. Yes, this is necessary for us to achieve our career, but the prerequisite is that we must have correct beliefs. Mr. Xu Zhong also said in his speech yesterday that wrong instructions coupled with crazy execution will be an irreversible disaster.

An argument from the positive side: Our socialist construction is facing many difficulties and problems. Are you choosing to avoid them at this time? Will our northwest become a no man's land?

Three opposing arguments: Do you want to move all the mountains in the northwest? Do you know that if one of the 100,000 mountains in Guizhou is moved, there will still be another?

The positive argument: Then why does our country still advocate the construction of a new Tibet and a new Xinjiang?

Three arguments from the opposing side: Yes, so we must pay attention to methods, instead of all our descendants wielding hoes and digging mountains.

Four arguments for the positive: Your so-called method is to move all the people away. Your relocation is one way, but if you move to a place and encounter difficulties and move again, then your children Will the descendants always move on endlessly like this?

Three arguments for the opposing side: Does the other side think that we will not solve the problem if we move people? How many resettlement villages are needed for the Three Gorges resettlement and how much support is needed from the state? Isn’t this difficult? Likewise, our immigrants must bravely shoulder their responsibilities, face difficulties, and solve them.

An argument from the positive side: The construction of the Three Gorges Project is to carry forward the spirit of our foolish old man who moved mountains. This is our country's greatest and most macro-scale project. This is not moving people but mountains.

Opposite argument: Yes, when we evaluate these great projects, we will say that the merits are in the present and the benefits will be in the future. But when Yu Gong was moving the mountain, could he finish it? Can he complete the move in this generation? He drags down his descendants and moves mountains from generation to generation. Will he benefit in the future? What if his descendants don't want to move mountains, but want to come to our Baijiang to be professional managers?

Four arguments for the affirmative: The other side has been moving this topic elsewhere. What we want to confirm now is whether we are moving mountains, whether it is the story itself or from Comrade Mao Zedong’s speech. Everyone understands that Yugong is moving mountains.

Four counter-arguments: I would like to remind the affirmative debaters to see clearly that our debate topic is whether Yu Gong moved mountains or people, not moving mountains, not ing, and not the present continuous tense.

Arrogant: The spirit of Foolish Old Man who moved mountains has inspired many generations of us. Now we must carry forward this spirit. Without the spirit of Foolish Old Man who moved mountains, would our business be successful?

Three arguments for the opposing side: What I would like to remind the other side of the first argument is that because of the spirit of Foolish Old Man who moved mountains, 1.1 million people died in Sichuan during the Great Leap Forward, with an average of 1 out of every 9 people dying. .

Four positive debates: Without the spirit of Foolish Old Man to Move Mountains, it would have been impossible for us to win the War of Resistance Against Japan, and it would be impossible for us to sit here and hold a debate happily today.

Three opposing arguments: We do not deny the perseverance of Yu Gong Yishan, but Yu Gong Yishan also contains the spirit of man's victory over nature, the consciousness of small farmers, and the spirit of being self-reliant. Is it also worth learning from?

Four arguments for the positive: Immigrant people are just standing on their own laurels because you want to escape.

An argument from the positive side: The spirit of Yu Gong Yishan is a spirit of contribution. He did not enjoy it, let alone escape or avoid conflicts.

Three opposing arguments: If he had a spirit of dedication, why did he wait until he was 90 before proposing to move mountains? How many more years would he live? This work was done by his descendants.

Four arguments for the positive: This just shows that he is advancing with the times. At 90 years old, he is still aggressive and wants to do things that others cannot do.

Another argument: Then I would like to advise the other party: don’t do anything that is not worth doing.

Three anti-party arguments: In fact, what we are debating today is not a spiritual issue like Yu Gong. The key is the method. Whatever we do, we must choose a low-cost, high-efficiency method. I would like to ask the other debater, if we face a river, should we go around it, or should we drink up the water before crossing it?

Four arguments: We need to build a bridge to get across. (Time for the affirmative is up)

Three arguments for the negative side: The opponent’s fellow debaters have repeatedly emphasized that Yu Gong is moving mountains. This is not something you can just move if you want. Our second argument just said that Yu Gong is moving mountains. It would take 10 billion and 5000 years to move this mountain. Obviously, even God thought it was impossible for Yu Old Man to move the mountain, so he sent Kuafu and his two sons to carry these two mountains on their backs. In order for an elderly man like this to fulfill his wish to see the sea, we should do our best to help him move and move his people out.

Four counter-arguments: If Yu Gong does not seize the time to move, communicate more with the outside world, and intermarry, in the long run there will be consanguineous marriages and pregnancies in that small village, and then the people in this small village will become increasingly unhappy. Being smart can only move mountains in the end.

Second argument from the opposing side: Hard work and hard work are not the entire spirit of the Chinese nation; pragmatism and flexibility are the spirit of the Chinese nation.

□ Concluding remarks

Four opposing arguments: I am very happy to discuss the topic of "Does Foolish Old Man move mountains or people?" with my opponent's debate friend ***.

The two of us were quarreling and arguing endlessly. In fact, the essence of the problem is: How do we deal with difficulties in a simple and efficient way? We found that the opponent’s debate partner had not changed his original intention and his method was biased. Now, please allow me to point out several problems that the other debater has:

1. Blind optimism.

2. Refer to deer as horse.

3. Raise the soup to stop it from boiling. Just because the spirit is worthy of admiration does not mean that it should be done.

Just now we have analyzed and demonstrated "Yugong should move people" from the aspects of theory, logic and facts. We believe that Yugong moved people instead of mountains. Below I will further demonstrate from the value level.

First of all, human progress can only be achieved through “immigration”. "Immigration" is the history of the development of human civilization. Human beings changed from climbing to walking upright, began to live in caves, moved out of caves and began slash-and-burn cultivation, moved out of closed mountain villages, and began commercial civilization. They bid farewell to small-scale peasant economy and moved towards industrial civilization. They continued to "move people" and made continuous progress. .

Secondly, "moving people" means breaking the closed and rigid thinking mode and promoting a modern thinking method that combines functions. Today, we in Baijiang are gradually developing and growing, moving out of the Three Hunan and Four Rivers to East China, going deep into Tianfu to South China, and then moving into the Northeast; from the initial bottling business to today's pipeline business, to value-added services; from siled operations to the integration of various resources. Which part does not reflect Baijiang people’s thinking of “relocating people”, and which part does not reflect Baijiang people’s modern thinking of combining functions?

Thirdly, "moving people" also reflects the spirit of seeking change in pragmatism, seeking truth from facts and respecting science. If you don't respect science, don't seek truth from facts, don't have the mindset to seek change for the ultimate goal, and don't adjust when you go in the wrong direction, but still stubbornly insist on it, no matter how hard you try, it will be nothing, and you will end up getting further and further away from the goal. In order to realize our corporate mission, we at Baijiang did not stick to the once glorious bottling business and business model. Instead, we adjusted our direction in a timely manner, entering the pipeline network business and changing the bottled gas retail business model to enhance our competitiveness. This is the embodiment of our spirit of seeking truth from facts and pragmatic changes in Baijiang for the ultimate goal. What Baijiang needs today is a spirit of pragmatism and change, rather than being overjoyed at success and being blindly arrogant. The history of our Baijiang is actually a history of practicality, change and innovation.

When it comes to now, winning or losing is no longer important. We know very well that our purpose is very simple: that is for everyone to gather together, have a collision of ideas, pool their efforts, and discuss Baijiang's big plan. As Mr. Chen Wei said: "The business we have created in Baijiang is unprecedented. Our businesses are spread across the country from north to south, and our business is rich and vibrant." Doesn't Yugong's move reflect the truth-seeking, pragmatism and fickleness of our Baijiang people? And the spirit of innovation?

If there is a way, if you are poor, you will change, if you change, you will be general, and if you are general, you will be long-term. Only by seeking change while being pragmatic and forging ahead with innovation can we break the rules and create new ones, break conventions, and win opportunities for development and growth. Let us create brilliance under the guidance of Baijiang Culture!

The four arguments of the affirmative: Our first, second and third arguments have proved from all aspects that Yu Gong is moving mountains. I will make some additions from the following aspects: Mao Zedong’s 61 years ago It was mentioned in a speech that we should learn from Yu Gong, the purpose is to remove the "three big mountains" above our heads. This is an example. In addition, in the story, God was moved and moved two mountains away, which also proves that Yu Gong was moving mountains. In our three arguments, the dustpans, hoes and other tools used by Yu Gong’s family in the story also prove that Yu Gong is moving mountains. The opponent’s debate friends have been leading us to change the topic in other directions. This is a way of subverting the topic. Although you have eloquence, in fact, black is black, white is white, and black and white cannot be reversed. In fact, these are not the most important things. The most important thing is that the transfer of the other party's friends is simply an irresponsible way of escaping reality and responsibility. We cannot advocate it, especially our professional managers in Baijiang, let alone have this idea. an attitude.

Today at this time, we borrow this treasure land of Beijing and the Monument to the People’s Heroes in Tiananmen Square