It depends on the specific situation. There are the following two situations: 1. The approved company name enjoys the right of name, and there is no infringement with the same name as the trademark. However, an unapproved company name may be infringing. 2. Although the approved company has the same name as the trademark, there is no infringement, but the illegal use of the trademark in violation of Article 57 of the Trademark Law constitutes infringement. Legal objectivity:

Article 64 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China * * * If the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark requests compensation, and the accused infringer pleads that the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark has not used the registered trademark, the people's court may require the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark to provide evidence of the actual use of the registered trademark in the previous three years. If the owner of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark cannot prove that the registered trademark has actually been used in the previous three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation. Anyone who sells a commodity that he does not know is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark and can prove that the commodity was legally obtained by himself and explain the supplier shall not be liable for compensation. Article 65 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China * * * Where a trademark registrant or interested party has evidence to prove that another person is committing or is about to commit an act that infringes on his exclusive right to use a registered trademark, if it is not stopped in time, his legitimate rights and interests will be irretrievably damaged, he may apply to the people's court for measures to be ordered to stop relevant acts and property preservation before prosecution according to law.