on December 8, 216, the people's Republic of China * * * and the Supreme People's Court publicly pronounced a judgment on a series of administrative disputes over the trademark of Jordan. The Supreme Law ruled that the registration of the disputed trademark "Jordan" damaged Michael Jordan's prior name right and violated the trademark law, and should be revoked. The judgments of the first and second instance were revoked and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board was ordered to make a new ruling. The court also found that the pinyin trademarks "QIAODAN" and "qiaodan" did not harm Jordan's name right.

Although many media and public opinion interpret this news, they all think that "Flying Man" Jordan won the final victory and got back his legitimate rights and interests. However, Jordan Sports said that it was only a "small negative" flying Jordan on several defensive trademarks, but it was not affected by its really important main IP.

on the 8th, the Supreme People's Court held a public hearing in the first court, and publicly pronounced 1 cases (hereinafter referred to as "Jordan's" trademark dispute series cases) of trademark disputes between Michael Jeffrey Jordan, the retrial applicant, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, and Jordan Sports Co., Ltd., the third party in the first instance. Justice Tao Kaiyuan, the presiding judge of the case and vice president of the Supreme People's Court, expounded the Supreme People's Court's opinions on the controversial focus of the case.

On July 19th, China Jordan Sports Company and American basketball star Michael? There was another dispute between Jordan. Previously, American Jordan sued China Jordan, and recently, China Jordan sued American Jordan to the court, demanding compensation of 1.1 million yuan.

China Jordan Sports Company is the official partner of the 13th National Games, while American basketball star Michael? Jordan authorized a law firm to send a lawyer's letter to Tianjin Sports Bureau and the Organizing Committee of the National Games. China Jordan Company believed that the lawyer's letter constituted an infringement of reputation, so Michael? Jordan and his authorized law firm sued the court for compensation.