Legal analysis: This is a very typical trademark infringement case, because the trademark law has a code of conduct for trademark infringement. Trademark infringement stipulated in China Trademark Law, its implementing rules and judicial interpretation mostly determines the jurisdiction and subject of the case according to the content or type of trademark infringement.

legal basis: article 57 of the trademark law of the people's Republic of China commits one of the following acts; All of them are violations of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:

(1) using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant;

(2) without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same commodity or using a trademark identical to or similar to its registered trademark on similar commodities may easily lead to confusion;

(3) selling goods that infringe the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;

(4) Forging or unauthorized manufacturing of registered trademark marks of others or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademark marks;

(5) without the consent of the trademark registrant, changing its registered trademark and putting the goods with the changed trademark on the market again;

(6) Deliberately providing convenience for infringement of others' exclusive right to use a trademark, and helping others to commit infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark;

(7) causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others.