When Steve Jobs resigned, some people were happy and some were sad. After Jobs resigned, Apple's stock price fell by 5%. The stock prices of related companies with direct interests in Apple were affected and fell one after another; while the stock prices of Apple's competitors such as Samsung and HTC all increased at a relatively high rate. The stock market obviously equates Apple with Steve Jobs, and believes that Apple with Steve Jobs is the most lethal. Jobs presided over the development of Apple's products in every detail. Apple is an IT company with more than 45,000 employees and the world's top product designers, engineers and marketers. Jobs alone brought the cohesion of everyone in the company together to achieve one goal - creation. China has now become the world's largest manufacturing country, and all top-quality iPhone 4s are manufactured by Chinese companies. From precision electronics to socks and lighters, China's manufacturing industry is developing rapidly, but why can't China produce "Jobs"? There are differences between China and the United States in terms of culture, history, system and social structure. Some of these differences have hindered the development of Chinese enterprises, resulting in China's insufficient "creation" and the emergence of few "disruptive" products. The United States has always been a paradise for adventurers. From the "Western Gold Rush" to today's Internet explosion, the United States has always been creating adventure darlings. As an IT company, Apple has also gone from taking risks to succeeding. The advent of the iPhone attracted worldwide attention. It marked that the phone was no longer a phone, but was endowed with fashionable functions and everything took on a new look. However, Chinese entrepreneurs lack the spirit of adventure and dare not innovate, let alone create. They have always followed the innovation paths of foreign companies and acted as followers. Take the Chinese TV industry as an example. From rear-projection TVs to current LCD and plasma TVs, they have been following the innovation pace of foreign brands. Not only are they unable to get to the market quickly, but similar products also lack the right to speak. If you can make money without innovating, who would innovate? Something happened in Chinatown in the United States a few days ago: a store engaged in Chinese funeral business had some paper car models marked with the logos of Mercedes-Benz and Porsche. The Chinese must all understand that these things are mainly burned during Chinese funerals for psychological comfort, and the form is greater than the content. But it was these paper cars that landed the funeral shop owner a jail sentence. U.S. police arrested the owner of a funeral shop on charges including trademark infringement. The Chinese people will definitely think this is making a fuss out of a molehill and think Americans are funny, but this fully illustrates the importance foreign countries attach to the protection of intellectual property rights. It is precisely because of the lack of strict intellectual property protection mechanisms in our country that piracy and plagiarism abound. In addition, according to the 2011 Hurun Wealth Report, China has 960,000 multi-millionaires and 60,000 billionaires, one-third of whom are involved in real estate investment, and this proportion has increased in the past three years. Chinese people like to make stable money. After accumulating a certain amount of capital, they hope to avoid the uncertain crises of the industry and speculate their wealth into more stable real estate investments. Many state-owned enterprises have even set up real estate development companies under their subsidiaries. It can be said that the booming real estate industry in recent years has hijacked China's manufacturing economy and also constrained the development of Chinese enterprises from the side. The huge profits from real estate have made low-profit industrial manufacturing companies unwilling to compete, and China's manufacturing advantages are gradually losing. This is the crowding-out effect of huge real estate profits on the manufacturing industry. If we want to put an end to real estate speculation in our country, we should learn from Germany. In Germany, real estate is not a huge profit industry, manufacturing is king. In the past ten years, German house prices have risen by an average of 1% per year, while price levels have increased by an average of 2% per year. In contrast, German house prices have actually shrunk at a rate of 1% per year. Since 1977, the average house price in Germany has increased by 60%, while personal income has more than tripled. Land in Germany is privately owned, and governments at all levels have clear restrictions on land use. Commercial areas and residential areas are clearly divided. Real estate prices depend on the market, not real estate developers. At the same time, every house sales transaction and house rental transaction in Germany will be recorded in order to calculate the average price of renting and selling houses in the area. Those who exceed this price will be subject to heavy penalties. This curb on opportunism by real estate developers and prohibition of huge profits by businesses makes real estate speculation in Germany completely unprofitable. It also allows German companies to engage in R&D and manufacturing with peace of mind, eliminating the idea of ??getting rich overnight. China's inability to produce Steve Jobs is directly related to many "Chinese characteristics". To improve this situation, the government and enterprises will need to make various efforts to raise awareness and establish an environment and mechanism suitable for incubating "Jobs".

First of all, it is necessary to "de-copycat" the government to support and encourage enterprise innovation and establish an effective reward system; secondly, it is necessary to curb the large profit margins of speculative economies such as real estate and prevent enterprises from assuming that they can obtain profits by relying solely on capital. The speculative psychology of profits; the last step is to establish a strict intellectual property protection system, combat plagiarism and plagiarism, and create a good competitive environment. Share to: Welcome to comment I want to comment