Intellectual property is such a thing. . Intellectual property rights can be protected as long as they are the intellectual achievements created by human beings. But the problem is, on the one hand, there is a certain period of protection. Traditional culture has been around for hundreds of years, and it is meaningless to protect it for more than ten years. . At the same time, intellectual property rights are used to guard against others. The problem of traditional culture is usually to find someone to infringe. . Moreover, the invention and creation of traditional culture has been hung up for many years, so it is not easy to apply. . Therefore, under normal circumstances, intellectual property rights are probably not used.

But since this is a debate, I still offer some ideas for your reference. .

First of all, traditional culture is also culture. Now it is a society ruled by law. Culture certainly needs intellectual property protection. Even the current network culture needs intellectual property protection. Traditional culture is not a thing called "traditional culture", but is composed of many specific contents, that is, cultural carriers. For example, works, research and other achievements, as well as products, even including the innovation of traditional culture and skills. These natural needs are protected by intellectual property law. At the same time, there are time-honored trademarks and the like, which need more protection.

Then it may be a bit difficult, that is, many traditional cultures need to prevent the impact of modern culture. Take Journey to the West as an example. If I say that Tang Priest and the Monkey King are homosexuals, it is obviously a violation of traditional culture. In order to prevent this influence, it is necessary for us to protect some traditional cultures themselves. After all, the debate only said "Do you need it?" It didn't say, "Is it ok according to the current intellectual property law?" .

Third, the protection of intellectual property rights itself has a promoting effect. If the evaluation is a "well-known trademark", it is a kind of propaganda in itself. Only by making more representatives of traditional culture competitive, at least vital, can we say that traditional culture can be protected. What's more, if legal thinking is ignored in intellectual property protection, the debate seems to be not protected by the Intellectual Property Law. . . As a legal person, it really is. . Maybe it can also include investment in the cultural field, so it will be easier to fight. . . In fact, if you want to apply for protection, you need to leave detailed information, so at least you can ensure that it will not be lost. . . .