This is an ambiguous question! You can say yes or no. As long as the business model is good, someone will learn from it. After a slight modification, you can give it another name. Even if others see through it, they won't react much. As long as it doesn't touch their fundamental interests, they can probably get by. Furthermore, no one comes up with the business model first, only who makes it first. Of course, whoever makes it first doesn’t necessarily think it out first! The creation of the model means that there is a problem with the huge market effect behind it and the strategic vision of the leadership class! For example, in the well-known "Wanglaoji incident", I personally am not optimistic that Guangzhou Pharmaceutical can maintain this famous brand effect. Compared with Jiaduobao Group, Guangzhou Pharmaceutical has introduced the "Wanglaoji" trademark into other industries other than herbal tea, which is equivalent to diluting the famous brand effect. , if it cannot open up the market, it will slowly withdraw from the mainstream. In addition, I have great doubts about the marketing team of Guangzhou Pharmaceutical. Jiaduobao Group has 3,000 marketing teams. After years of hard work, the value of "Wanglaoji" has reached 150 billion. Jiaduobao won the promotion of CCTV. After hard work Although the market that we have worked so hard to build will not shrink immediately under Guangzhou Pharmaceutical, the contacts accumulated by Jiaduobao Group over the years are enough to open up the market again. In the near future, we will see two major national brands contradicting each other. And this is exactly what foreign brands represented by Coca-Cola want to see! It has to be said that GPHL sold its sales of more than 20 billion a year at a price of several million a year. Although the decision was made when it was on the verge of bankruptcy, it was so hasty and the consequences caused that I regret it now. Engaging in internal strife, the ultimate loss will be China's independent national brand. This is the current lack of strategic vision of GPHL!