Legal analysis: It is also illegal to sell genuine goods without authorization. The unauthorized sale of genuine products does not directly infringe the trademark exclusive right of the trademark owner, but the executor's behavior of using the brand awareness that the trademark owner has been trying to expand for free without making any contribution to the product brand infringes on the interests of legitimate operators and disrupts the normal economic order, which is an unfair competition and should be stopped and bear corresponding legal responsibilities for his illegal interests.

legal basis: article 165 of the civil code. if an actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others through fault and causes damage, he shall bear tort liability. If the actor is presumed to be at fault according to the law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.