1. Contract Law and Trademark Law: Authorized Trademark Law
2. Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure: the bribery case of Jiaduobao.
3. Arbitration law:
4. Advertising Law:
5. Copyright Law: Copyright of the appearance of red cans.
6. Civil Procedure Law: Jiaduobao appealed to the court to revoke the trademark ruling of "Wang Lao Ji".
Jiaduobao Wang Laoji incident:
Jiaduobao and GPHL were originally cooperative. Jiaduobao bought the trademark of Wang Laoji from Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Group, and then produced the red jar of Wang Laoji. Jiaduobao made a series of publicity for Wang Laoji, and there was a phenomenon in the market that he was afraid of getting angry and drinking Wang Laoji.
Wang Laoji brought huge profits to Jiaduobao. At the same time, perhaps due to the contract, GPHL receives the trademark of GPHL Wang Laoji from Jiaduobao every year, which has not increased with the huge profits. This led to a series of lawsuits.
Wang Laoji got angry, but it happened in recent years 10. In 2002, Jiaduobao leased "Wang Lao Ji" from GPHL, and its sales in that year reached 65.438+0.8 billion yuan, which rose to 600 million yuan in 2003. The annual sales income of Wang Laoji in Red Pot is 654.38+0.10.06 billion yuan, which exceeds that of Coca-Cola. However, GPHL's green box Wang Laoji's sales in 20 1 1 are less than 2 billion yuan, and even this achievement may be due to the hot sales of Wang Can Laoji.
Before the red cans of Wang Lao Ji sold well, GPHL failed to promote Wang Lao Ji, who was only famous in Lingnan. 20 12 On July 4th, GPHL sued two Guangdong distributors who sold Jiaduobao products with the words "Wang Lao Ji", demanding that they stop the infringement and claim 500,000 yuan respectively.
2065438+July 9, 2002: GPHL announced that it had applied to the local customs for detaining Jiaduobao products on the grounds of infringement, among which Guangzhou Huangpu Customs detained Jiaduobao products up to 17 tons. GPHL also announced that Jiaduobao infringed the right to decorate the trademark of "Wang Lao Ji" and filed a lawsuit. 201July 13: The Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court ruled that Hongdao Group's lawsuit was dismissed, putting an end to the trademark competition case between GPHL and Jiaduobao.