Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - Huawei's dilemma reappeared, and HarmonyOS's trademark application was rejected again, even though it has been used?
Huawei's dilemma reappeared, and HarmonyOS's trademark application was rejected again, even though it has been used?

Read slowly, read slowly, and the fun is below!

what? Huawei's HarmonyOS system is going to roll over?

Huawei's HarmonyOS system is expected to replace all Android systems in June, but now it is going to be overturned. Is it true?

HarmonyOS trademark

It is understood that on May 12, China National Intellectual Property Administration and relevant departments announced that the judgment of Huawei HarmonyOS System Pure word mark 3837327, which Huawei applied for in May 19, was made public, and the trademark already had similar trademarks, which easily caused confusion among consumers, so it was decided to reject all Huawei's litigation requests!

this news is extremely unfavorable to Huawei's current situation. As we all know, Huawei's T5pro is currently in the internal testing stage, and this system will replace HarmonyOS of Android. It can be said that the upcoming listing is an aspect of Huawei's reversal of the war. Now, the rejection of trademarks is undoubtedly Huawei's nightmare!

so what's the confused trademark?

The trademark application filed by Huawei as early as May 19 was actually registered nearly 1 years ago. One was Beijing Coast HarmonyOS Standard Material Technology Co., Ltd. for 1 years, but it doesn't matter, because this is a company that makes cosmetics, and the other is Hebei HarmonyOS Advertising Development Co., Ltd. in September 11, which is a company that makes basically the same electronic software category as Huawei, belonging to 42 categories. If it is repeated, it will be repeated here. Then Huawei?

After China National Intellectual Property Administration rejected Huawei's trademark application in May, 22, unconvinced Huawei took China National Intellectual Property Administration to court in a rage three months later. His demand was to withdraw the rejection judgment of Huawei's HarmonyOS trademark and pass it, but things didn't go as smoothly as expected. China National Intellectual Property Administration didn't use other illegal means to approve it. People followed the normal approval process. Obviously, Huawei lost the lawsuit!

In response to this incident, many netizens have begun to say that Huawei does not constitute cybersquatting. The reason is that Huawei's R&D in HarmonyOS started in 216, and it didn't apply for a trademark until 19 years ago. Both companies are five years earlier than the research and development time and nine years earlier than Huawei's own application. Therefore, Huawei does not constitute a cybersquatting. Of course, some netizens said that this constituted cybersquatting. Obviously, these remarks have been confirmed and the right and wrong have been answered.

The above contents only represent personal opinions!