oupu and opple are not from the same manufacturer. The problem of Oupu Electrician is not counterfeiting, but a registered trademark dispute.

In p>216, Opus Lighting was sued for infringement claims of 5 million yuan. The content of the dispute is that although its company name is Opus Lighting, it only owns Opus, and the trademark rights of lamps and electrical products such as switch sockets and wiring boards are the plaintiff's.

Ople Lighting Company believes that it uses OPPLE Ople Lighting on its products, which is only the defendant's own business name, not a trademark, and the English words OPPLE and OUPU are different, which will not cause confusion and misunderstanding among consumers, so it does not constitute trademark infringement.

Extended information:

Related commodity fields involved in the trademark:

1. Since 21, three people, including Wang, have become the trademark owners of "OUPU" in electrical products such as plugs, sockets and vacuum tubes, and will be valid until July 2, 22.

2. Opal Lighting Company believes that all the products sold in stores are lighting, and the trademark "OPPLE" is used on switch sockets, which is not infringing. Opus Lighting Company enjoys the trademark right of "Opus Opus" on lamps, but does not enjoy the trademark right on electrical goods.

China Economic Net-Opal Lighting was sued for infringement claim of 5 million yuan, and the prospectus became evidence of claim

China Economic Net-Opal Lighting raised funds to expand production, which was difficult to digest the sued trademark infringement claim of 5 million yuan.