AVG 7. 1 free version
Avast！ 4.6 After the free version is registered, you can use the upgraded German antivirus software AntiVir for free, but the professional version is charged.
Domestic:
Oriental Guardian 2005 Download Edition
Micro-point active defense system (used for a period of time, it feels ok, but the operation interface is more complicated, which is not the same as the mainstream anti-virus software now, and sometimes there will be false positives. Experts can use it well, but it is not recommended for people who are not familiar with the system. ) 90 days free period.
The other four softwares are described in detail in the following introduction, and they are evaluated in detail by Pacific Net. I believe you will have a preliminary understanding of other anti-virus software after reading it.
Because the registration number of the online registration machine is flying all over the sky, many genuine anti-virus software can also be said to be free, so I attach a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of some anti-virus software:
In fact, antivirus software has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Jinshan Hill
Do not occupy memory, start quickly. It is said that it has the function of double killing, and the anti-virus speed is quite fast. But it doesn't support Trojan horses with shells, and shells can't be found, so Jinshan has no resistance to hidden deep disasters. However, a few years ago, when he was still in the public beta, he preferred to use it. He thought it was cute at that time.
rising antivirus software
Only the simplest upx shell is supported. Trojan horses and viruses are widely used now, and this shell is rarely used, so some people say that killing domestic viruses can kill foreign viruses, which is why it is not very easy to use. The memory occupation is ok, but it is larger than others in China.
I prefer the function that he can tell me whether the registry has been changed at any time, but this function is not very practical for users who are not familiar with the registry. To be honest, I don't use much, which is why I am less infected with viruses. If the previous monitoring is done well, I can get rid of the virus before it does. But Rising has almost become the decoration of some Trojan horses, which is useless. Its anti-trojan effect is poor, so I think it's best to use it with Ewido, and I like to use it like this now. For users who are not familiar with computers, its advantage is that it can check the loopholes in the system and download patches.
Norton (male name)
The occupied system is relatively large, and the virus database feels seriously incomplete, so it is not supported to add shells. If you use systemworks+ Security Special Police, the startup will be very slow (slower than Kaspersky). Really don't understand, an antivirus software, p4 1. What's the point of using 8G configuration? If the effect is the same, the virus just slows down the computer. . . So it's the same sentence above. If you are willing to sacrifice performance for safety, then use ZA with Kaspersky! Kaspersky is much better than Norton because it also sacrifices performance.
McAfee
Not much memory, fast startup, slower than Jinshan. Real-time monitoring is better, and active network attacks can't escape him, but the ability to kill viruses that pass monitoring is not particularly strong. Anti-virus ability is not as good as Kaspersky, system monitoring is said to be very good, and the interface is good. But I don't use it often, and I don't know why.
Jiang Min
Support killing two kinds of shells, but the effect is poor. It is said that the monitoring ability is not bad, but it is hard to say anything because it is not commonly used, but I like to use the hard disk repair function under DOS in Jiang Min. Generally speaking, the use of system resources is small, and Trojan horse killing is better than Rising, but it is still insufficient. Firewalls are annoying. The tip is too much. And there is no vulnerability repair function. It may not be easy for ordinary people, because you may not know whether to publish the content of its reminder.
dongfangweishi
One of the few free antivirus software in China. But it seems that few people use it, and I have never used it myself. It is characterized by the function of protecting files destroyed by viruses.
skynet firewall
In China, by constantly upgrading IP rules to ensure security, it can also be used. But compared with foreign products, such as ZA, it feels unreliable. The resource occupation is relatively small.
Kaspersky
I used it a long time ago, then it was called AVP, and then I gave it up, which was too resource-consuming. It is said that it can support more than 4000 kinds of shells, and its anti-virus ability can be said to be second to none, but its fragile real-time monitoring ability is not so good, and it is often possible to hang up before the virus is found. In addition, Kabbah's system resources take up like a vampire devil, which makes the system performance drop a lot and feels like a virus, so although it has good anti-virus ability, I definitely don't need it. To ensure safety, you must install a ZA. But it's terrible, so keep an iron wall and do nothing. Relatively speaking, Kabbah's virus detection speed is relatively slow, because there are many virus libraries, and each file needs hundreds of thousands of virus libraries to set up, so it is necessary to think quickly. . . Very difficult
Evido
To prevent the interception of trojans, Ewido is better. If it can be used, you can basically find out whether there is any suspicious port occupied, disconnect the suspicious connection, and then kill it. The disadvantage is that I am not very good at killing viruses. I only killed 23 viruses (out of 25) in the virus test package test. Therefore, it should be used with anti-virus software. Fortunately, the resource usage is very small, 1026KB, which is116 of IE browser.
F- safety
The antivirus software made in Finland is said to combine AVP, Libra, Orion and Tianlong, one of which is Kaspersky's antivirus kernel. I have used it in the past. Personally, I feel that the anti-virus efficiency is better than Kaspersky's, and it is particularly effective for popular viruses on the Internet. It's just that there are too many processes, nearly 15 processes, but it doesn't feel as good as Kaspersky.
BitDefender career a
A software killer in Romania has a lot of Kaspersky's virus database, and now it is about 1.5 million, but the virus database of this software has been nearly 22W in the same period, and Kabbah is already cold. So I won the first place in the tests of some websites. But it doesn't mean that he is very powerful, and the virus database doesn't mean anything. BitDefenderProfessional's actual anti-virus ability is not necessarily better than Kaspersky's. This is also because of the earth's crust.
Nod32
Microsoft's anti-virus software, which has been used for four years, starts quickly, occupies little resources, and has a strong advanced heuristic virus detection, but it does not respond well to Trojans.
I have won many authoritative awards, but the disadvantage is that the promotion is slow and difficult. Basically, all the servers that can be upgraded are cracked servers in domestic universities, while the official servers are very slow to upgrade. So it is not suitable for home use.
Trojan horse trainer
Domestic, charging, it seems that there is no real-time monitoring ability. I don't like it very much, but some friends can understand it with the mentality of supporting domestic products.
Fair personal firewall
Free products. It is said that a unique "Traffic Oscilloscope" has also been introduced, which makes the network traffic clear at a glance and vividly shows the network state, and is suitable for users who are not familiar with computers.
360 security guards
I used it when I installed coral polyps, and I felt it was a rogue software. Take it off, chicken ribs.
Rogge cleaner
Domestic tools for killing advertisements and rogue software, free software. I feel that similar products are doing better, supporting the upgrade function, and upgrading is more frequent and faster.
Avast！
Czech anti-virus software is free, and some friends in China say it is beyond Kaspersky's software.
Pacific Review article about this software/pcedu/ping/0512/743242.html.
There are also related details written by a netizen synow /article.asp? id= 148
The evaluation is not credible, but its firewall occupies small memory, which once made me feel that this anti-virus software has no firewall function and its monitoring ability is not bad. It's interesting to have P2P monitoring, which is better than Kabbah. Like Kabbah, 24-hour monitoring of virus updates should be quick.
But I didn't mention it in this article before. There are two reasons. One of them is incompatibility. He will kill Rising like a virus. I wonder if it has anything to do with the piracy I used. I will find a genuine test when I have time. I also heard that he regards QQ as a virus, which may be related to some spy modules that Teng Xun joined. This will cause many problems, in addition, the setting is a bit monotonous and less personalized, and you will know it after using it.
Some anti-virus software that used to be famous, but now it is unknown.
VRV
I am most confused about domestic antivirus software. The first antivirus software I used should be from Beixinyuan. I remember when I was a rookie. It's been six years. I miss it. At that time, the source seemed to have two products, North Source and South Source. I was confused at that time. Today, I don't know why this company has north and south, and the trademark interface is very similar.
It is said to be free software, but I seem to have seen genuine software sold in the Federation. It is stupid to use and takes up less system resources. Compared with Kabbah. Rise. Evido. Anti-virus of Trojan, that is, even the files are deleted after the virus is found. Beixinyuan can separate the virus from the files to a certain extent, and only delete the virus. This function can be said to be quite good. But on the whole, my evaluation of this antivirus software is not too high, even if it can remind me that my computer broke down 47 times a month and was finally scrapped for repair. . . Warm experience.
A few years later, I used VRV2005 again. There are three disadvantages in using VRV:
First, there are too few upgrades in Beixinyuan, which is at least manifested in two aspects:
1。 Macroscopically, the company's antivirus software has not been upgraded for at least three years, and the 2002 version has been downloaded so far. Moreover, the company's interface has remained unchanged for many years, and I am afraid this interface has been used for at least seven years. I remember when CIH broke out, the company had such an interface. It is easy to give people the feeling that the main program has not been upgraded, although the company keeps pace with the times in its operating system.
2。 Microscopically, for example, today it is 2 1, and the company's virus database is still 15. Obviously it is not consistent with the development speed of the virus. The company upgrades its virus database once a week. Judging from the current situation, I'm afraid the number of virus libraries in the company's software is not large, but the number of virus libraries can't judge the quality of an anti-virus software, but the software upgrade is slow, which is a fact.
Second, there seems to be no obvious improvement in function.
1。 The company's anti-virus software does not support the production of DOS version of U disk, which is unimaginable in other software. Although the DOS version has little practical effect, it can bring a sense of security and convenience to old users.
2。 Fake upgrade of antivirus software under DOS version (only the version number is rewritten, but the virus database is not updated). A person wrote a letter to make a suggestion, but the company didn't accept it. Explain that the DOS version only kills viruses that pose a major threat to Windows, and the fake upgrade is to comfort users, so that I doubt whether the Windows version is really upgraded. Now it seems that it is very unsafe for users who trust DOS antivirus not to upgrade in time.
Third, it seems that the help file has not been updated and there are dead links. The company's website was www.vrv.com.cn, and www.linhao.com.cn was added later. But for some reason, the company canceled the latter, but the help file did not delete the latter, resulting in the death of the link.
I deleted it after using it for one night. It is estimated that few people use this software now. It is said that only some government agencies will see it in the office when purchasing.
To sum up, I would like to make a few points:
Some friends think that anti-virus software is first-class as long as it kills viruses. In fact, I think this view is not correct. For example, macfee, in fact, killing viruses is not so powerful, and of course it is not as brutal as Kaspersky. But why does it also have a broad user base and a good reputation? Obviously, macfee's monitoring is perfect, which can be said to be watertight. What harm does it do to monitor such a good killing software that its anti-virus ability is slightly weak? Because the first line of defense virus is insurmountable, isn't it the greatest success? On the other hand, Kaspersky's antivirus is powerful, but it is precisely because of the lack of monitoring that the virus can invade. However, in view of its excellent anti-virus ability, the second line of defense virus can not pass, and reverse thinking may be able to figure it out!
In addition, I need to emphasize that Kaspersky is not suitable for everyone. Everyone should install anti-virus software according to their own actual situation. Kaspersky takes up system resources more like a nouveau riche, and it is easy to bring down the computer. If the configuration of the computer itself is not high, the CPU processor ability is not strong, or the memory is as small as 256MB, I think I'd better forget it. After all, you have to pretend to know what is slow. You open Kaspersky, in addition to getting my system should be a safe psychological comfort. Instead, I appreciate the practice of some friends. You don't need to install any anti-virus software, just have a firewall to play with, after all, save resources! I admire even more users who dare to streaking the computer to surf the Internet!
I hope you don't blindly follow the trend. Kaspersky is good, Kaspersky is awesome, but it doesn't mean that you must rush to install Kaspersky. Why, there are so many antivirus software in the world, why do you have a crush on him? Everyone is right!
-
The above information is for personal use only and is for reference only.