Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - Are the cultural relics in the Forbidden City copyrighted? How much is it?-On the copyright of Chinese paintings before the Qing Dynasty
Are the cultural relics in the Forbidden City copyrighted? How much is it?-On the copyright of Chinese paintings before the Qing Dynasty
Why do you charge copyright fees for things in the Forbidden City?

"

The Forbidden City

" is not only a palace, but also a state-owned cultural symbol, a gold-lettered signboard. Is copyrighted.

The Forbidden City

A Thousand Miles of Rivers and Mountains

Cultural and Creative Works "and" XX Cultural and Creative Works Based on A Thousand Miles of Rivers and Mountains, the original is hidden in the Forbidden City ",the former may infringe, while the latter does not. The word "Forbidden City" as a "signboard" belongs to the state in many cases when it comes to business (the Forbidden City Cultural and Creative Team).

Copyright fees generally refer to royalties. Royalties, also known as royalties, are the monetary benefits collected by the creators or copyright holders of intellectual property rights to other people who use their intellectual property rights. People who use intellectual property rights such as copyright, franchise,

copyright

, trademarks and patents may have to pay royalties. Are there any copyright restrictions on historical sites or cultural relics?

There is no copyright restriction, but it's best not to use it for commercial purposes, especially in the Forbidden City.

After all, there was no so-called concept of copyright at that time.

You should not apply for a patent to make a model with materials, but you can only enjoy the copyright of this model, and the copyright is automatically generated when the work is completed.

It is possible to copy, paint, photograph, video and so on works of art set up or displayed in outdoor public places. Even if you use other people's photos, I personally think it doesn't matter, because all photos are not pictures taken, which is equivalent to a description of the content. Even if there is a so-called copyright problem in photographic works, it is generally impossible to prove the existence of copyright. After all, all photos reflect objective facts, and everyone takes them this way, so it is impossible to prove that someone took them.