Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - ByteDance sued today's Henan fried bread companies, how to effectively curb the frequent infringement?
ByteDance sued today's Henan fried bread companies, how to effectively curb the frequent infringement?
ByteDance co., ltd sued today's fried dough sticks and other Henan companies. This matter has really exploded on the Internet recently. Let's see which company today's fried dough sticks belong to. Today's fried dough sticks belong to Henan Today's Fried dough sticks Catering Co., Ltd. Its business scope is not Internet information, but mainly agricultural products, prepackaged foods, food and catering enterprise management, food processing and so on. Judging from the industrial and commercial information, it has nothing to do with today's headlines, but trademarks are indeed misleading.

For example, their advertising words, today's headlines say that you care about headlines, and for today's headline catering co., Ltd., their advertising words care about you, which is good fried dough sticks. There is indeed a concept of stealing between the two, but it has not caused enough misunderstanding. It's all for publicity, and the same meaning is completely different. This is called infringement. I think it is more to use today's and related designs.

How to curb infringement, then the first thing to do is to actively defend rights and protect rights in time. Whether there is infringement, I think there are relevant laws, but prosecution is the right of every enterprise. Today's headline co., ltd. sued today's fritters, which I think is reasonable and legal. After all, today's headlines think that today's Fried dough sticks Co., Ltd. has infringed the relevant rights and interests of today's headlines, but whether it can win the case can only be seen in the corresponding judgment of the court.

Second, the establishment of punishment mechanism can effectively curb the frequent violations. After the infringement, the infringer should pay the corresponding price, such as restoring the reputation, compensating for the loss of reputation, and making the company bear the corresponding legal responsibilities. Of course, we should also punish these infringing companies accordingly, so as to warn those infringing companies and let them know that infringement will pay a heavy price.

Finally, we should know how to improve the efficiency of rights protection and reduce the time cost of excessive rights protection. It's always a headache to protect rights and take too long, so by increasing this efficiency, the phenomenon of frequent infringement can be effectively curbed.