If you just use these two words, it does not constitute infringement.

As long as you don't use their trademarks.

From the perspective of my country’s trademark law, the constitution of trademark infringement usually includes the following elements:

First, the infringement causes damage or is about to cause damage, that is, the infringement brings harm to the trademark owner. Damage has been caused or is about to be caused, which can be manifested as a decrease in product sales, a decrease in profits, or a decrease in trademark reputation.

The second is the illegality of the behavior, that is, the perpetrator objectively exercises the rights enjoyed by the trademark owner in accordance with the law without permission and without other legal basis.

Third, the damage consequences are causally related to the illegal behavior, that is, the damage consequences are directly caused by the illegal behavior.

The fourth is the subjective state, including fault and no fault. Generally speaking, if an actor illegally uses a trademark that is the same as or similar to a registered trademark, forges or creates without authorization the logo of another person’s registered trademark, or reversely passes off a registered trademark, the subjective fault of the actor shall be the essential factor in determining whether the infringement is infringement. ; As for the act of selling goods with counterfeit registered trademarks, the subjective fault of the perpetrator is not required when determining whether the infringement is infringement.

Trademark infringement generally includes four aspects. The main reason is that the other party’s behavior causes certain damage to you, or some damage will occur, and the other party’s behavior is not done by the trademark owner. Authorized.