On March 3, 20 16, the defendant changed the company name from? Kitakyo kaieki information consulting service co., ltd? Change to? Beijing drip irrigation agent technology development co., ltd?
The two sources told the Beiyang court that Didi's behavior violated 14 149622? Didi? The legitimate rights and interests of famous trademarks stopped the defendant's infringement on the defendant, suspended? Didi? If you use the company name, and ask for compensation of 3 million yuan.
The court said, Didi? The trademark has reached a well-known level at the time of prosecution and constitutes a registered trademark. The defendant used the website, official WeChat account and employee business card to emphasize including? Didi? Or? Didi? Signs include. Copy, copy, translate? Didi? Trademark, is it possible to put it on it Didi? The trademark owner misled the relevant public, and the plaintiff provided or provided specific means of communication, such as related use and related companies. May lead to misunderstanding among the public, lead to this situation and infringe upon the plaintiff? Exclusive? Trademark.
Besides, does the defendant know about this? Didi? Trademark name, company name by? North Island Information Consulting Service Co., Ltd.? Change to? North Island Drip Irrigation Butler Development Technology Co., Ltd.? , for commercial use, to? Didi? The subjective defects of trademark names are obvious, which violates the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics. Constitute unfair competition.
Finally, the Beiyang court ruled that the defendant should stop infringing the heterogeneous trademark and stop using it? Didi? In the name of the company, it shall be ordered to compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses. Neither party appealed and the ruling came into effect.