1, the source has been indicated in part.

2, some just provide material for the work.

3. There is no accountability requirement for these stolen original videos.

These stolen publications do not involve commercialization, and do not harm the rights and interests of the original authors in essence. On the contrary, it has played a certain propaganda role and is also beneficial to the cited party.

Film and television dramas are generally copyrighted, so when using the content of film and television dramas, you must obtain the consent of the copyright owner of the film and television drama before you can use it. There are some TV dramas on Tik Tok platform, which have been authorized by the copyright owner, allowing users of Tik Tok platform to use on Tik Tok platform, so even if users use them, they will not infringe the rights of TV drama copyright owners.

However, the Tik Tok platform does not have the permission of the copyright owner or the film and television drama materials obtained by users in other channels. If the content of a work is edited, adapted or modified without the permission of the copyright owner, it constitutes infringement. If you don't want to infringe, you need the authorization of the copyright owner to use it.

Under the following circumstances, the people's court may preliminarily determine that the defendant intentionally infringed intellectual property rights:

(1) After being notified and warned by the plaintiff or interested party, the defendant continues to commit the infringement.

(2) The defendant or his legal representative or manager is the legal representative, manager or actual controller of the plaintiff or interested party.

(3) The defendant has labor, labor service, cooperation, license, distribution, agency, representative and other relations with the plaintiff or interested party, and has had contact with the infringed intellectual property rights.

(4) The defendant has business dealings with the plaintiff or interested parties, or has negotiated for the conclusion of a contract, and has been exposed to infringed intellectual property rights.

(5) The defendant pirated or counterfeited a registered trademark.

(six) other circumstances that can be identified as intentional. Article 4 The people's court shall comprehensively consider the means and times of infringement, the duration, geographical scope, scale and consequences of infringement, the behavior of the infringer in litigation and other factors to determine the seriousness of the infringement of intellectual property rights.

If the defendant is under any of the following circumstances, the people's court may determine that the circumstances are serious:

(1) Having been subjected to administrative punishment or convicted of infringement by the court, committing the same or similar infringement again.

(2) Infringement of intellectual property rights.

(3) Forging, destroying or hiding evidence of infringement.

(4) refusing to perform the preservation ruling.

(5) Infringement gains or the obligee suffers huge losses.

(six) the infringement may endanger national security, public interests or personal health.

(seven) other circumstances that can be identified as serious.