The bank legal business represented Guangdong Development Bank, Guangdong Branch of Agricultural Bank of China, Jiangmen Branch of China Construction Bank, Guangzhou Baiyun Sub-branch of Bank of China and other banks in more than 8 litigation and non-litigation cases, and achieved high results.

there are 51 legal advisers who have served as legal advisers for companies and individuals (if the same company or individual has hired legal advisers for more than two years in a row, it will be counted as one). Provided a large number of high-quality and efficient legal services for the parties.

litigation cases handled more than 3 litigation cases (excluding bank litigation cases). There is a very high success rate in handling cases of plaintiffs, defendants or other parties. For example, the case of the property ownership dispute between Ms. Wu and Mr. Qiu, the acting appellants, won completely. (22) Sui Zhong Fa Min Er Zhong Zi No.185 Civil Judgment. Acting as the defendant, Mr. Ye won the case of rural contract dispute. (22) Hua Fa Min Chu Zi No.1956 Civil Ruling. Acting as the defendant, Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd. won the case of compensation dispute for damage caused by hanging objects falling. (23) Tian Fa Min Yi Chu Zi No.88 Civil Mediation. The case of product liability dispute of Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd., acting as the defendant, was successfully won. (23) Tian Fa Min Yi Chu Zi No.45 Civil Ruling. The case of representing the defendant, Mr. Xiao, in the dispute over payment for goods was a complete victory. (23) Yun Fa Min Yi Chu Zi No.161 Civil Judgment. Guangzhou * * Trading Co., Ltd., acting as the defendant, won the dispute over the termination of the lease contract. (23) Yun Fa Min Yi Chu Zi No.674 Civil Judgment. Guangzhou * * * Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., the defendant, won the case of lease contract dispute. (23) Yun Fa Min San Chu Zi No.1124 Civil Ruling. Served as the defender of appellant Chen Xbang, defending the second trial and retrial of the case of drug trafficking (46 kg), which was a great success, and the defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment from death penalty. (23) No.572 Criminal Ruling of Yuegao Law and Punishment. Criminal judgment (24) No.11 in Guangzhou, China and France. Acting as the defendant, Nanhai Yanbu Health Care Products Industry Co., Ltd. won the case of processing contract dispute. (23) Yun Fa Min Er Chu Zi No.986 Civil Judgment. (24) Sui Zhong Fa Min Er Zhong Zi No.17 Civil Judgment. Acting appellant Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd. won the case of construction contract dispute. (24) Sui Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No.442 Civil Ruling. Guangzhou * * * Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., acting as the defendant, won the case of lease contract dispute. (24) Tian Fa Min San Chu Zi No.173 Civil Ruling. Acting as the defendant, Guangzhou * * * Machinery Co., Ltd. won the labor dispute over economic compensation. Sui Fang Lao Zhong Case Zi [25] No.35 Award. Mr. Zhang, the agent appellant, won the second trial successfully. (25) Sui Fa Min San Zhong Zi No.618 Civil Judgment. The case of representing the defendant, Mr. Qiu, in the loan dispute was a complete victory. (25) Dong Fa Min Er Chu Zi No.21 Civil Judgment. The case of Ms. Wu's loan dispute was won on behalf of the defendant. (25) Dong Fa Min Er Chu Zi No.211 Civil Judgment. Served as the defender of the defendant, Jian * Village, successfully defended his case of suspected drug trafficking (7,9g), and the defendant was sentenced to three years and six months' imprisonment. (25) criminal judgment (No.32). Acting defendant Mr. Zhao won the case of personal injury compensation dispute in road traffic accident. (26) Hai Min Yi Chu Zi No.575 Civil Mediation. As the defender of the defendant Jiang Xfeng, he defended the case of his alleged traffic accident and achieved great success. The defendant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and suspended for four years (ranging from 3 to 7 years). (26) Hai Xing Chu Zi No.1254 criminal judgment. As the defender of the defendant Liang Xmin, he successfully defended the case of his alleged intentional injury, and the defendant was sentenced to six months in prison. (26) Hai Xing Chu Zi No.1373 criminal judgment. As the defender of the defendant Lin Jinyun, he successfully defended his case of suspected drug trafficking, and the defendant was sentenced to seven years in prison (ranging from 7 years to 15 years). (27) criminal judgment, No.41 of the Criminal Chu Zi of Guangzhou Railway.

foreign-related cases

1 foreign-related cases were handled. Except for one case, nine cases were successful. (Hong Kong) Mr. Pan's dispute over changing houses. (2) Li Fa Fang Chu Zi No.1352 Civil Judgment. (Singapore) 22 * * Witness case of trademark license agreement of Singapore Private Limited Company. (France) Mr. Huang's contract witness case in 22. (Macau) Witness case of Mr. Zhong's house sales contract in 23. (Taiwan Province) Chen Xbang's drug trafficking case. (23) No.572 Criminal Ruling of Yuegao Law and Punishment, and (24) No.11 criminal judgment of Guangzhou Law and Punishment. (Germany) In 25, Germany * * * United with Emery and Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Foshan * * Abrasives and Abrasives Co., Ltd., and the case of trademark infringement was settled through mediation. (Germany) In 25, Germany * * * United with Emery and Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Dongguan * * Trading Co., Ltd. and Dongguan * * Grinding Products Factory for trademark infringement and unfair competition, which was settled through mediation. Drug trafficking case in Jian * village (Taiwan Province). (25) criminal judgment (No.32). (Hong Kong) Lin Jinyun's case of transporting drugs. (27) criminal judgment, No.41 of the Criminal Chu Zi of Guangzhou Railway. (Australia) Miss Hu's divorce case. (27) Nanminyichuzi No.2286 Civil Judgment.

classic case in 24, Taiwan Province native Chen * bang was sentenced to death in the first instance for drug trafficking (46kg). Lawyer Yang defended him in the second instance and retrial, which was a great success. Chen * bang was sentenced to life imprisonment instead of death. In 24, represented the defendant Nanhai Yanbu Health Care Products Industry Co., Ltd. in handling contract disputes. Acting as an agent for the first and second instance and applying for execution. This lawsuit won and the counterclaim won. In 25, a Taiwan Province citizen, Jane * Village, was suspected of drug trafficking (7,9g). Lawyer Yang successfully defended her, and Jane * Village was sentenced to three years and six months in prison. In 25, he represented the appellant Mr. Zhang in the dispute over arrears. In the first trial, Mr. Zhang entrusted other lawyers to lose the case, and Mr. Yang turned the second trial into victory. In 25, the trademark infringement and unfair competition case of Germany * * United emery and machinery manufacturing joint-stock company v. Dongguan * * Trading Co., Ltd. and Dongguan * * grinding products factory was a great success and won high praise from the parties. In 25, the trademark infringement case of Germany * * * United emery and machinery manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Foshan * * Abrasive and Abrasive Co., Ltd. was a great success and won high praise from the parties. In 26, Jiang Xfeng was suspected of causing traffic accidents, causing death and having an escape plot. Lawyer Yang successfully defended him, and Jiang Xfeng was sentenced to three years with a suspended sentence of four years (ranging from 3 to 7 years). In 27, Lin Xyun, a Hong Kong citizen, was suspected of transporting drugs, and lawyer Yang successfully defended him, and Lin Xyun was sentenced to seven years (ranging from 7 to 15 years).