Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - What are some examples of combating counterfeit and substandard products?
What are some examples of combating counterfeit and substandard products?

1. Selling unqualified hot-rolled ribbed steel bars

On November 30, 2016, the Economic Inspection Detachment of the Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau received the report and passed the investigation. 2 Jinshansi Community, Tongchuan District Group (Jinlong Avenue) seized 5 trucks of hot-rolled ribbed steel bars on site, totaling 166.88 tons.

Six batches of this batch of steel bars were seized and sampled on site, and all were judged to be unqualified after inspection. It was found that this batch of steel bars was sold to Dazhou by Liu Moumou from a steel factory in Yuncheng, Shanxi. According to the provisions of the Quality Law, 166.88 tons of unqualified hot-rolled ribbed steel bars were confiscated and a fine of 270,000 yuan was imposed.

2. Sales of mini-tillage machines that do not meet national standards

On February 18, the Kaijiang County Market Supervision and Administration Bureau launched an investigation into a Machinery Trading Co., Ltd. in Kaijiang County based on reports from the masses. An on-site inspection found that the diesel micro-tillers sold by the company were suspected of not complying with the relevant regulations of the "Emission Limits and Measurement Methods of Diesel Engine Exhaust Pollutants for Non-road Mobile Machinery (China Phase III and IV)".

After investigation, the company purchased 13 units of a certain brand of mini-tillage machines (diesel engine KA250) from Chongqing, and has sold 3 units, with a total estimated value of 36,400 yuan. According to the provisions of the "Quality Law", 10 mini-tillage machines (diesel engine KA250) of a certain brand in Chongqing were confiscated, illegal gains of 2,700 yuan were confiscated, and a fine of more than 100,000 yuan was imposed.

3. Use of unfair competition methods and commercial bribery

On October 25, 2016, the Tongchuan District Industrial and Commercial Quality Supervision Bureau launched a lawsuit against a communication company in Tongchuan District invested by Wei. An inspection by the Equipment Business Department found that “Home Credit” consumer loan products were suspected of improper rebates and rewards.

It was found that Wei launched this consumer loan business in order to increase mobile phone sales, and reached a verbal agreement with Shenzhen Home Credit Financial Co., Ltd. to allow "Home Credit" Finance to exclusively carry out consumer loans at its business premises. financial services and promote Home Credit loans to consumers.

Wei demanded a bribe of 3% of the loan amount in the name of "Consumer Loan Incentive Fund", crowding out other competitors, and finally received a "Consumer Loan Incentive Fund" of 44,400 yuan. According to the provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, his illegal gains of 44,400 yuan were confiscated and he was fined more than 100,000 yuan.

4. Car sales companies attach unreasonable conditions

On December 1, 2016, the Dachuan District Administration for Industry and Commerce discovered during an inspection that a Dazhou car sales company had During the sales process, "mortgage fees" are collected from mortgage customers and "subsequent payments" are collected from car purchase customers.

After investigation, the company did not stipulate in the "Commercial Vehicle Sales Contract" and arbitrarily attached unreasonable conditions to customers who purchased cars with mortgages, charging "mortgage fees" and "subsequent payments". According to the provisions of the Sichuan Provincial Anti-Unfair Competition Regulations, the company was ordered to correct its illegal behavior and fined 10,000 yuan.

5. Jewelry stores sell gold below cost price

On January 17, the Xuanhan County Industrial and Commercial Quality Supervision Bureau inspected a jewelry store in Xuanhan County and found that the jewelry store sold gold at a price lower than the cost price. It purchased gold at a price of 275 yuan/gram and sold it at a price significantly lower than cost in order to squeeze out other competitors. According to the provisions of the Sichuan Provincial Anti-Unfair Competition Regulations, the company was ordered to correct its illegal behavior and fined 10,000 yuan.

People's Daily Online - In order to crack down on the illegal production and sale of counterfeit and shoddy goods, Dazhou reports ten typical cases