On March 30th, Chengdu Longqing Network Technology Co., Ltd. was fined 6.5438+0.29 million yuan, and the illegal income and property were confiscated 5.65438+0.6 million yuan;
On April 16, Shanxi Jinshangxun Network Technology Co., Ltd. was fined about 92,500 yuan;
On May 2 1 day, Shanghai Jingge Network Technology Co., Ltd. was fined about 802,900 yuan;
On May 25th, Shanghai Yisheng Culture Media Co., Ltd. was fined 800,000 yuan;
On May 28th, Shanghai Qisou Network Technology Co., Ltd. was fined about 8 1.45 million yuan.
3 15 Current Situation of Counterfeiting Rights Protection
All along, China has been using administrative and judicial means to crack down on counterfeiting and protect rights, which is also a characteristic of China. China has a large administrative law enforcement team. Although 3 15 can investigate and deal with a large number of fake and shoddy products every year, as a government act, administrative law enforcement is difficult to meet the needs of enterprises and markets in efficiency and effectiveness.
To this end, domestic enterprises and brands have begun to organize their own teams to carry out anti-counterfeiting rights protection with great fanfare, such as Maotai, Puma clothing, Jubilance and so on.
Corporate rights protection is mainly carried out through judicial means. Of course, the costs and risks generated in this process make many enterprises miserable. After repeated efforts, some enterprises have developed to the point where fake and shoddy products go unpunished.
With the deepening of the market economy, some organizations and individuals have emerged in the society to help enterprises maintain the market and brand development with their rich experience in safeguarding rights and perfect networks. Through market-oriented and large-scale operation, they have explored an effective way for enterprises to fight counterfeiting and protect their rights.
The above content refers to the upstream news-what happened to the enterprise exposed on March 15 last year? A number of false medical advertising agents were fined, and Kohler was fined 500,000 for collecting facial information.