Chow
Does the accepted picture trademark constitute infringement?
2022-04- 14
Kong Ling imitates a la
Chow
Does the accepted picture trademark constitute infringement?
2022-04- 14
Kong Ling imitates a lawyer.
Beijing Yingke (Wenzhou) Lawyer Office
consult
Professional analysis
The accepted picture trademark does not constitute infringement, and one of the following acts infringes the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:
1. Using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant;
2. Selling goods that infringe the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;
3, without the consent of the trademark registrant, change its registered trademark and put the goods with the changed trademark on the market;
4. Deliberately providing convenience for infringing upon the exclusive right to use a trademark of others and helping others to infringe upon the exclusive right to use a trademark.
The exclusive right to use a trademark refers to the exclusive right granted to the trademark owner to use his registered trademark on the designated goods or services according to law.
legal ground
Article 57 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) commits any of the following acts, all of which are infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:
(1) Using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant;
(2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same kind of goods, or using a trademark identical with or similar to its registered trademark on similar goods is likely to cause confusion;
(3) selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;
(4) Forging or unauthorized manufacturing of registered trademark marks of others or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademark marks;
(five) without the consent of the trademark registrant, the registered trademark is changed and the goods with the changed trademark are put on the market again;
(6) Deliberately facilitating the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark of others and helping others to commit the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark;
(seven) causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others.
bale
At present 1, 0435 lawyer is online.
The fastest 3 minutes response.
Consult immediately
Everyone is still searching.
Trademark picture
How to deal with infringing trademarks?
Business scope of 35 trademarks
Individual operators were sued for trademark infringement.
How to judge trademark infringement
How much is the fine for trademark infringement?
How to deal with trademark infringement
How to judge the crime of stealing trademarks?
Trademark infringement cases of small self-employed households
Trademark infringement judgment standard 2022
2022 trademark infringement cases
How to identify trademark infringement
Conditions that constitute trademark infringement
What is trademark infringement?
How to judge trademark infringement of 65438+ 10,000?
Punitive damages for trademark infringement
The difference between trademark and logo
How to deal with infringing trademarks in general?
Criteria for judging trademark infringement
Elements of trademark infringement
Seven manifestations of trademark infringement
How to deal with trademark infringement by self-employed individuals
I was sued for trademark infringement.
Infringement of international trademarks
Relevant suggestions
Can similar trademark patterns constitute infringement-Lawyer Popularization of Law-Franco
If the administrative department for industry and commerce finds that the infringement is established, it shall be ordered to immediately stop the infringement, confiscate and destroy the infringing goods and tools mainly used to manufacture infringing goods and forge registered trademarks. If the illegal business amount is more than 50,000 yuan, a fine of less than five times the illegal business amount may be imposed, and there is no illegal business operation. ...
Does the use of similar trademarks constitute infringement? -Popularization of lawyers.-Fargo
China's Trademark Law stipulates that a trademark that is identical or similar to another's registered trademark on the same or similar goods cannot be registered. The trademark owner may, within the statutory time limit, consider that the registered trademarks of others (including those applied for registration and registered trademarks) are the same as or similar to his own registered trademarks. ...
Can similar trademark patterns constitute infringement-popularization of lawyers-Fargo
The similarity of legal popularization content and trademark pattern can constitute infringement, but the following conditions need to be met: 1, used on the same or similar goods or auxiliary services; 2. The two trademarks are identical or similar; 3. The infringed trademark is a registered trademark, that is, a trademark protected by the Trademark Law. People's Republic of China (PRC) trademark ...
Whether the captured pictures are published in newspapers constitutes infringement-Lawyer Popularization of Law-Franco
Generally speaking, the captured pictures published in newspapers with legal popularization content will not constitute infringement. Journalists' shooting is mostly within a reasonable range, which is formed because of their special occupation. Therefore, it is generally not considered infringement. However, if the reporter's shooting behavior causes damage to the photographer, it constitutes infringement and may cause infringement to the photographer. ...
Does the use of similar trademarks constitute infringement-popularization of lawyers-Fargo
The use of similar trademarks in the content of law popularization constitutes infringement. Article 76 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) uses marks identical with or similar to other people's registered trademarks as commodity names or commodity decorations, misleading the public, which belongs to the second paragraph of Article 57 of the Trademark Law. ...
Related search
How to judge trademark infringement of 65438+ 10,000?
Punitive damages for trademark infringement
The difference between trademark and logo
How to deal with infringing trademarks in general?
Criteria for judging trademark infringement
Elements of trademark infringement
Seven manifestations of trademark infringement
How to deal with trademark infringement by self-employed individuals