Attachment: Reply of Hangzhou West Lake Longjing Trademark Infringement Case

Reply

Respondent:

Because of the case number of the respondent v. Respondent's trademark infringement dispute, we hereby make the following reply to the respondent's claim, and ask the court to adopt it.

The respondent disagrees with all the claims of the respondent, and the claims of the respondent have no basis. Please ask the court to reject all the claims of the respondent according to law.

I. well-known trademarks

II. Legal sources

III. Basis of loss

Request the court to reject all the claims of the respondent according to law.

To the

Court

Respondent:

Date

Key Law: The Latest Trademark Law-Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (implemented on May 1, 214) Article 64 Where the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark requests compensation, and the accused infringer pleads that the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark has not used the registered trademark, the people's court may request the exclusive right to use the registered trademark. If the owner of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark cannot prove that the registered trademark has actually been used in the previous three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation.

anyone who sells a commodity that he doesn't know is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark and can prove that the commodity was legally obtained by himself and explain the supplier shall not be liable for compensation.

Tip: Harmony is the most important thing, and we hope that both parties can reach a settlement.