Recently, one? Chanel sued Huawei logo for infringement and lost the case? The news triggered a heated discussion among netizens and caused a heated discussion on the Internet. We know that with the development of society, there are more and more companies in the world, and each company has its own unique trademark as a sign of being recognized by the public. However, there will always be some similar trademarks, or some small brands deliberately imitate the trademarks of big brands in an attempt to rub them. For example, before Wang Laoji and Jia Duobao, they fought for several years for the appearance of bottles, and finally Wang Laoji won. And it's not just Wang Laoji. There are many things like this. For example, our famous biscuit Oreo is the hot object of being rubbed. What else is imitating Oreo? Guangdong benefits Guangdong? Ollie gave it to you? Wait, they are also very similar in the outer packaging. This time, something happened. Since Huawei and Chanel, who couldn't get together, were also involved, Chanel sued Huawei's logo but lost the case. Does this behavior count as touching porcelain?

1. Calculate

Why do you say calculate? I think it's mainly from the starting point of Chanel. If Chanel sued Huawei for touching porcelain, then if the starting point is to make money and pay compensation, then it must be touching porcelain, but I don't think Chanel should be such a starting point.

2. If it doesn't count

, it is also a reasonable result, because the LOGO of Chanel and Huawei are really similar, and they really think that Huawei is more likely to imitate them.

III. Summary

Generally speaking, Huawei's LOGO is easy to distinguish from Chanel, which led to Chanel's final defeat.

The above is my opinion on this issue, which is purely personal and for reference only. You can leave a message in the comment area if you have any different opinions, and let's discuss it together.